I love the books, but it's like Daniel, playing Harry, completely over-dramatizes his role in the movie way too much. Deep, heavy breathing all the time. I think Ron and Hermione do well with their parts. They also leave so much out that comes from the book too, like Harry's date with Cho Chang, and the setting is so grim. They made Umbridge stand out too much also. She didn't stand out THAT much in the book! They didn't even mention Dobby or Sirius and hanging up those rules on the walls that took like 30 minutes of the movie!!! -that wasn't even in the book! No Rita Skeeter either! ---Deep Disappointment.
2007-07-27 20:32:06 · 9 answers · asked by Rick 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The thing people who read the Harry Potter books and THEN watch the movies need to remember is that the two are not the same thing. A book can never be perfectly reconstructed into a movie, as they are two completely different mediums. If you try to forget that you read the books, and watch the movies as if it's your first time, you'll find it to be alot more enjoyable. All in All, the fifth movie was done alot better then some of the past ones. With such a long book, it could have been a lot worse.
2007-07-27 20:37:26 · answer #1 · answered by A.W. 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
for my area, i think of that the 5th Harry Potter replaced into the 2d suitable one yet. It had a sturdy action scene even nevertheless it additionally dragged on and on plenty. The fourth Harry Potter action picture replaced into quite the suitable!
2016-10-09 11:52:26 · answer #2 · answered by quaas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Except for Luna (who was done very well) all of the characters fell flat, giving me no reason to like any of them or caring about their plight.
I also missed the school ghosts. Where were they? Perhaps they hated the movie too and left the theater. I wish I went with them.
2007-07-27 20:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by thezaylady 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I felt it was long enough already without adding an extra hour trying to include every person and every event. In most cases, books are much better than the film.
2007-07-27 20:38:02 · answer #4 · answered by Georgie 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
yea i think it was the worst out of all of them...less action...and did not really show much...but it was only the begining cuz there might be something big in the next movie
2007-07-27 20:37:22 · answer #5 · answered by Bass 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I like this , but its true, they didnt really explain things very well.
2007-07-27 20:59:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
it sucked in ur dreams....sorcerers stone sucked...chamber of secrets sucked too but was better than sorcerer's stone....prisoner of azkaban was good...goblet of fire was awesome...order of the phoenix is the best
2007-07-27 21:18:40 · answer #7 · answered by LFC REDS 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
no..u did harry rocks!!!!!
2007-07-27 20:41:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
i liked it!. :)
2007-07-27 20:40:12 · answer #9 · answered by WrongHole 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋