English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Provided homeland security after devastating terrorist attacks on 9-11. Not a SINGLE incident since. Numerous al qaida henchmen apprejended/killed Tax cuts have spurred unprecedented economic prosperity inlight of aformentioned terrorist attacks. No child left behind has "mysteriously" raised test scores for most schools around the nation, holding poorly performing schools around the country acocuntable. Has successfuly dethroned an autocratic dictator, liberating millions of subjugated peoples. Has provided relief and aid to battered areas of extreme natural disasters, Katrina ,floods, tsunami. Has successfully funded faith based initiatives. Has successfuly installed conservatives judges to an ailing liberal bench. Has worked hard to protect the lives of unborn babies by not providing federal funding of fruitless unscrupulous scientific research. Has successfully warded off anti-free speech legislation like "fairness doctrine" to keep the airways free as our foudning fathers intended

2007-07-27 17:54:19 · 20 answers · asked by aCeRBic 4 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Those who complain about Bush need to stop doing so long enough to realize there hasn't been another terrorist act on our soil because any planned have thus far, been thwarted and those who would have carried them out have thus far, been arrested.

- They don't like to think about that truth.

Yes, Bush is a great president for many reasons.

2007-07-27 18:05:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Don't you dare talk about no child left behind as if it is a good thing. It has put a lot of pressure on test scores of reading and math and has left children behind in every other core section of education. Why did this happen? Well it is because they don't test Social Studies or Science. Last time I checked we also needed more in shape children, but while we are raising our math and reading skills lets just skip the gym class. Apparently, if it isn't on the test who cares. Who cares if our kids can't point out America on a map, or they don't know what the constitution is... it isn't on the test.
You talk about how he helped Katrina, well weren't we a little slow on that. Weren't many people stuck in dangerous circumstances because our president didn't respond fast enough.
Also, in AMERICA we should not have a president FUNDING faith based initiatives. This country was based on Christians who came here to get away to have religious freedoms. It is an insult to our countries founders to be proud that we have resorted to a religious, faith based country.
Based on your unborn babies safety fund, how about the fact that Bush has nothing against in-vitro and the throwing away of the unused eggs in that scientific area. A lot of, by your definition, unborn babies are thrown away every day because a woman didn't need the other ones based on their successful pregnancy.
While I'm sure Bush isn't a horrible man, he isn't the best in the last 100 years. I don't even think Bush would say he was the best in 100 years, there are some pretty great men to go up against.

2007-07-27 18:17:34 · answer #2 · answered by Sam K 3 · 1 1

You are dreaming! It may be a NeoCon Wet Dream but it is just a dream!
Bush 2 takes the Country and his father's standing down with his disaster. It is worse than the Titanic! Or the Great Depression. It is worse than 9-11 or even Pearl Harbor. It is more trying than the Cold War or the attack on Ft. Sumner in 1860.
America has a huge Debt, Amazing inequality, totally decrypted regulatory system for Business. The major cities in America are worse off than than we were before Watts in California. The Prison Systems in America are a cancer on our social and governmental systems.
The Trade laws and educational Systems are broken. The roads are bad! The Water in the Country is more polluted than eight years ago. The Park Systems, Post Offices, Mass Transportation Systems and Police Departments no longer work for the benefit of Americans.
In short, Bush maybe the end of our System!

2007-07-27 18:27:55 · answer #3 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 0 1

Unprecedented economic prosperity? For who? Millions who are struggling to pay off their debts? Tens of thousands who are losing their homes? Oh, you mean the rich ones, yes that's right, they are prospering, all right.
No child left behind created false scores and no better education. Children who score high in some states, score poorely on the national level. That tells you what?
Dictator is gone, and so are tens of thousands of others, completely innocent, while a whole country is literally in ruins. But it is far away, and who cares that these people are dying if we are safe. As if we are. So much blood is on his hands.
As for Katrina,we know how well he handled that one. People have not come back yet.
Scientific research will be done, in spite of his stupidity, and yours. And as for faith based initiatives, which faith? Or should I even bother to ask?

2007-07-27 18:14:07 · answer #4 · answered by VPOC 3 · 0 2

Kennedy replaced into remarkable, yet FDR replaced into extra acceptable in case you inquire from me (if no longer the rest, probable by using fact Kennedy's time replaced into minimize so short)... he led us by way of an exceptionally undesirable time, the two the large melancholy and WWII, and replaced into positive in defeating the two (despite the fact that Truman formally ended WWII, it replaced into already gained in the previous he took place of work) ... Bush quite trumps any of those you suggested as worst in case you inquire from me... i might say it quite is Bush and then Nixon. the two considered one of them broke intense nationwide rules and need to be impeached. Clinton isn't a sturdy guy or woman, and is cheating. He replaced into impeached by potential of how, in simple terms no longer removed from place of work. Carter I agree, a large guy and extremely advantageous guy, yet in simple terms wasn't super adequate for the briches of the U.S. Presidency.. large diplomat nevertheless.

2016-10-09 11:46:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well.. the "airwaves" were unknown to the founding fathers... they would have considered a radio or TV to be magic.

They'd barely begun to play with electricity... (Read about Ben Franklin's famous kite flight)

*********************

However... compared to certain other Presidents within the past 50 years... he's done pretty well.

No cases of one of our embassies' personnel being held hostage for over a year...

No double-digit inflation... but the new minimum wage hike series may change that...

**************

Definitely not the worst President we've had... (One was stupid enough that Darwin won, when he caught pneumonia due to not wearing a coat for his inauguration)

2007-07-27 18:05:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

9/11 happened on HIS watch.
Numerous Al-Qaida henchmen still at large...and growing in numbers, thanks to this administration and the mishandling of an illegal war.
The housing market totally sucks and the Dow just plummeted.
So those Liberal teachers are good teachers after all?
There is NO SUCH THING as liberation in Iraq, foolish one. Keep your blinders on.
Ask the thousands of homeless Katrina victims living in poisonous FEMA trailers how they feel about Bush.
Successfully funded faith-based initiatives for the likes of Ted Haggart.
Illegally fired judges based on partisan principals, and covers up for a lying, cheating Attorney General Gonzales.
So it's OK to just throw embryos in the trash? That's not really protecting them, is it?

After 7 years in office and 5 years in Iraq...one must say Bush is definitely s.l.o.w. at best.

2007-07-27 18:08:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Er...what? Can you at least make it sound coherent? You seem to be either rambling on about something or copy-and-pasting from some bulleted article. Cut to the chase and make your question clear. Your additional info looks like someone else's attempt to answer your question. If you already have an answer, then why ask the question? If you want us to tell you whether or not we agree, then say so. Otherwise, you are making me sleepy for nothing.

2007-07-27 18:07:50 · answer #8 · answered by fliptastic 4 · 3 2

To call Bush a great president is an insult to the office of the president.

2007-07-28 04:49:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well, I don't know about the last 100 years...

But he might be the greatest president in the last 7 years...

2007-07-27 18:44:03 · answer #10 · answered by ALsensei 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers