2007-07-27 17:06:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
PLEASE DON'T THUMB DOWN ANY ONES ANSWER, THANKS
2007-07-27 17:07:29 · update #1
OIL for most, greed, regional domination, effective presence in case Iran and Syria burst out, provide essential protection or support to Israel and cases in that manner!
I will not buy the "bull crap" that is been given by bush and his nasty administration along with their supporters on daily basis! NOT EVEN FOR A SECOND!
$600 mil. embassy in Iraq! You think US will leave that country? NAH...! NOT till the last drop of oil is controlled and consumed by US!!!
2007-07-28 06:56:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummmm - lets take a closer look at why -
Saddam was a terrorist and a murderer, his dismal compliance with UN inspections left plenty of suspicion that he still possessed chemical arsenals, he had previously used these weapons on his own citizens, he paid ransoms to the families of people who indiscriminately slaughtered innocent men, women and children, the world's intelligence agencies all supported the belief that he still possessed WMDs, his own troops believed he had WMDs and, even in hindsight, it doesn't seem reasonable that the President should have assumed that Saddam had actually complied with the UN sanctions and hence risked the future safety and security of the United States on this assumption.
Instead, he acted accordingly and did what he thought was necessary to assure that Saddam did not have any weapons or chemicals that inevitably would have channeled their way into the hands of the terrorists.
It is far better to KNOW that Saddam or any WMDs he may have had are not a threat than to assume they are not.
Obviously, the hatred and blood lust of the different religious sects was severely underestimated.
2007-07-27 18:09:06 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The media does not show you why saddam hussien needed to be removed. He was a brutal dictator and a destabilizing force in the middle east. The idea was to bring democracy to the middle east and let it spread, but sadly, all muslims know is war and death. When the UN and our gutless allies walked away, it kind of left us holding the bag. In addition, saddam likely had some serious weapons, which he moved into syria while we waited for the UN to vote.
2007-07-27 17:17:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Simple, to Liberate Iraq, and to secure our safety here at home!!
Make sense, or do you not believe in Liberating a country that has been oppressed for thousands of years?
2007-07-27 17:18:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
We need OIL, don't we?!!
And of course, we always cover it up with world peace and democracy!!!
2007-07-28 07:04:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would think he wanted to divert attention from osama bin laden, becuase bush used to deal with osamas family. its all dirty politics.
2007-07-27 18:01:21 · answer #6 · answered by ankitmi 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why the hell are you a top contributor?
2007-07-27 17:23:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
out of greed
2007-07-27 17:15:01 · answer #8 · answered by me 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
don't really know
2007-07-27 17:20:49 · answer #9 · answered by granny58 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋