English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and dont give me this bs about innocent until proven guilty,u know why,because when ur rich and famous the judicial system in this country fails to do justice every time.absolutly every piece of evidence u can dream of was against oj simpson but he got off,why because he was rich and famous.does that mean we woud be ok if he started to do commercials and tv apperances,of course not,because any 1 with an iq over 10 knows he did it.because the justice system fails when it comes to celebrity,and u have this much evidence against u,someone needs to hold them responsible because we know the jury wont.if he is found not gulity,having him play is the same as saying ur allright with oj doing orange juice commercials,after all the jury said not guilty right.but no company will touch him,why?and dont bring up the duke case,because there was NO evidence in that hoax,not the same here ,of course black people will say this is about race,will they celebrate like they did when oj got off on murder?

2007-07-27 16:51:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

7 answers

How stupid are those people who don't believe in the basic Constitutional right of inocent until proven guilty? I suspect that he did know about it (not the same as planning and doing it but still a felony) but that is meaningless until after the trial. Until that time ,he is INOCENT!

2007-07-27 18:15:51 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1 1

People that think he is innocent are VERY stupid, to answer your question directly.

Just like the people who thought O.J., Michael Jackson, Bill Clinton, Paris Hilton etc were innocent. They are fans, and will look the other way and be in complete denial when their hero turns out to be a jerk/murderer/molester/rapist/drunk.

I'm all for redemption, but for gawd's sake, there are some things that cross the line. Especially when they deny things that are so obviously true and offer no contrition at all.

On a side note, WHY don't these celebrities EVERY dress appropriately for court???? WHITE shirt, DARK suit. That simple. "Business attire required." This skeezoid showed up in some kind of shiny suit that either looked like plastic or leather and some tacky pimp-looking shirt and tie combo like he was going to the club; strutting into court all cocky.

GUILTY AS DRESSED!

2007-07-27 17:04:08 · answer #2 · answered by Viceroy 2 · 1 2

You need to get over the O.J. verdict. That was 11 years ago. Double jeopardy was out as of 4 years ago. Besides if you want to blame anyone, you blame the prosecution for being shotty. In Michael Vick's case, he has not been convicted of anything. So before you go shooting off your mouth, why don't you let the process take place. Besides, with Paris Hilton having to return to jail, that means that the rich and famous don't always get out of doing their time.

2007-07-27 17:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by Solomon Grundy 7 · 3 1

Very Stupid

2007-07-27 16:58:28 · answer #4 · answered by ∴Dezmoo∴ 3 · 0 2

These people are absolutely IGNORANT.
It doesn't take an Einstein to see what really happen here.
I think he should not be allow to ever come back. No consideration at that.

2007-07-27 16:59:18 · answer #5 · answered by If u were wondering, It's me 5 · 0 1

i think vick is guilty. just because they are rich they get let off. its not fair.

2007-07-27 19:17:59 · answer #6 · answered by sillybear 3 · 0 0

Not very, since he hasn't yet been convicted of a crime.

2007-07-27 17:03:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers