English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yeah I know, same old question...

but being that oil is the only thing that sustains a lot of the middle east...it would be like the owner of a really crappy restaurant shooting his best customer...

I am open to answers from both sides of the fence, please be polite...thx

2007-07-27 16:11:58 · 8 answers · asked by ☺☻☺☻☺☻ 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

Nothing to both questions. Hussein was quite content dictating his own people and striking fear in the hearts of his neighbors. He hated any rogue factions that might threaten his absolute power. All of which made him despicable; none of which made him in anyway involved in the terrorist attacks on 9/11.

2007-07-27 16:18:49 · answer #1 · answered by Bon Mot 6 · 4 0

he would have gained nothing. he didn't plan on attacking anyone. He had a great life. George W douchebag got mad that he threatened his daddy and lied us into war

2007-07-27 23:15:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Depends on the result.

2007-07-27 23:21:31 · answer #3 · answered by bobanalyst 6 · 1 0

I dunno why was he paying money to families who would basically donate a member of the family to be a suicide bomber.

This was to Palestinian suicide bombers not something going on in Iraq.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/04/03/world/main505316.shtml

2007-07-27 23:31:55 · answer #4 · answered by sociald 7 · 1 0

He couldn't have nor would he have.

What nonsense !!

2007-07-28 00:38:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

nothing.. because he didn't do it... it was the USA who attacked him.

2007-07-27 23:14:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well he didn't do it and it wouldn't be in his benefit to do it.

2007-07-27 23:19:48 · answer #7 · answered by belle 4 · 2 0

Nothing, same as hitler.

2007-07-27 23:17:22 · answer #8 · answered by johncagain 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers