After Obama said that he would talk to Chavez, Clinton attacked him. He countered with a very good retort. What do you think?
2007-07-27 12:58:01 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Hallelujah!
2007-07-27 13:15:06 · update #1
I'm voting for him.
I like him, he seems pragmatic.
I don't get the whole not talking to them thing....youre the prez of the most powerful nation on earth! What is there to be afraid of? I would invite them over and tell ten what is what, influence them. Influence is Power!
We talked the USSR to death, but we ignore Castro and he's still there.
Hell, you want to take down North Korea? Try this:
Normalize relations with them! He holds on to power because he is isolated...imagine Pyongyang with a US embassy in the middle of it and a line a mile long of people trying to get visas while listening to NSYNC and watching American pie movies!
We isolate him, and he can tell his people that we will eat their babies and they will not know any better...that is why isolation works in their favor.
That is how you destroy Communism!
2007-07-27 13:05:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Firstly, I would absolutely not support him at all. In my estimation he is one of the worst candidates the Democrats have to offer. I support none of the Democrats but this choice (Obama) is a significantly bad one.
Secondly, he did not reply with a "good retort" at all. What he did was to give Hillary further foreign policy credit and exposed his own naive stance on the issue to the entire country showing himself to be a significant danger to the nation and making himself even more unelectable than he previously was.
2007-07-27 16:22:25 · answer #2 · answered by Calvin 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If I remember the 'retort' correctly, it was just to re-itterate that he opposed the Iraq war and she voted for it. I think everyone who knows that 'Obama' isn't the name of the leader of Al Qaeda, probably already knew that.
But, anyway, yes, I'd consider voting for Obama if he won the Democratic primary - but the Republican running against him would have to be pretty bad, much worse than any of the current frontrunners...
2007-07-27 13:10:57 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i'm no longer vote casting for obama first simply by fact I did my own examine on all applicants on the initiating and desperate then to vote for Hillary, simply by fact i think like she is the terrific one to get the interest carried out, and additionally simply by fact of his loss of judgment, besides as his loss of judgment appropriate to rezko, ayres and his pastor, and his loss of judgment whilst he took his six and 9 3 hundred and sixty 5 days outdated females to pay attention hate speeches. And his turn flopping on the matters and on issues hes says, his lack of ability to p.c.. a facet interior the senate and vote quite then in basic terms vote casting modern or no longer showing up in any respect , his loss of adventure, i do no longer believe he's honest on a great style of issues. And in basic terms in particular simply by fact i do no longer believe he's able to working this us of a. He has a tough time giving solutions without have them already written down for him, he makes use of alternative peoples words. And this us of a has been divided simply by fact of it. I additionally ask your self what else will come out approximately him. And if it comes after human beings vote for him, it is going to likely be too previous simply by alter it.
2016-10-12 23:17:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would certainly vote for him ... in 2016 after eight years as Hillary Clinton's vice-president. By then he will have plenty of experience.
2007-07-27 13:19:23 · answer #5 · answered by RE 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for Obama if and only if Ron Paul is not the Republican nominee.
2007-07-27 13:02:26 · answer #6 · answered by greencoke 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for him over Clinton everyday. We DO need to try diplomacy before we run for the guns. Besides, what would Hilary do anyway?
2007-07-27 13:01:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think it is nice to have someone talk about hope and what we can do not only what we can't. Still i have not made up my mind yet.
2007-07-27 13:55:24 · answer #8 · answered by kikers 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would. He seems like a very intelligent man, and that's a quality that's currently in very short supply in Washington D.C.
2007-07-27 13:10:31 · answer #9 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no, I'm more in favor for Protestant white males that will help America not destroy it. Everything a lot of these candidates aren't. I'm just going to vote for Ron Paul anyway. He wants to controll immigration and other weird people coming into the country
2007-07-27 14:45:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋