The goblin was not the true owner. It was stated earlier in the book that goblins think they forever own what they make and so then he took the sword without it being given to him. Harry had not gotten the goblet yet, and so the 'deal' with the goblin was incomplete and therefore a theft. The contract broken, the sword belongs to the House and could be retrived as needed. (Hello, the hat was also on fire)!!! Loved the book.
2007-07-27 12:38:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Goblin got it back in the vault, but just like the sword was in the office when Harry was able to pull it out of the hat in book 2, the same enchants were on the sorting hat, that a true Gryffindor would be able to pull it out when they needed it.
2007-07-27 13:17:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by nanners454 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The ghoul didn't take it, the goblin Griphook did, in the Gringott's vault.
This is a bit of a hole in the plot. The theory is that the Sorting Hat can conjure the required "help" when asked for, and could retrieve the sword from its hiding place.
2007-07-27 12:28:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by teresathegreat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
neville was being a brave gryffindor and the sword comes to use if needed in a brave situation...
ie. harry and the basalisk. [it came from the sorting hat.]
neville had a "mission" to kill nagini and had to be brave to stand up to voldemort. seeing as the sorting hat was there... he pulled it out.
and it was a goblin... not a ghoul. and it was probably "called upon" for greater use and left the hands of griphook.
2007-07-27 12:37:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by life. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only a true Grryfindor can pull that sword out of the hat, and since he stood up to a former Slytherin he was a true Gryffindor. Im just wondering if the Goblin was pissed cause he lossed it
2007-07-27 12:29:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by uiop b 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He pulled it out of the Sorting Hat. Remember in the second book, Harry pulled it out of the Sorting Hat to kill the basilisk. The hat acts like a transporter for the sword when Gryffindors are in need. Dumbledore did say: "Only a true Gryffindor could pull that out of the hat..."
2007-07-27 12:47:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lou Lou 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Goblin, Griphook took it during the escape from Bellatrix's vault ----- but yes, good question how it ended up back in the hat. I am confused by that one, too. It doesn't make much sense. If the Goblin (the "rightful" owner) had it, why would it go back to the hat??
Unless......... maybe the rightful owner really was thoe in Gryiffindor, so the hat "called" the sword away from Griphook?.....
2007-07-27 12:29:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by AmandaL 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
you in all likelihood get the basics yet why could you opt to try this after that is any such large sequence? in case you do not decide to study all of them i could advise interpreting 5-7 because of fact is have been the foremost issues start up taking place. The 5th action picture i'm distinctly constructive shrink approximately 250 pages, the sixth shrink out approximately 3 scenes and extra 2. lots grew to become into ignored in a number of the flicks. i individually advise interpreting 3-7 (the 1st 2 video clips are precisely the comparable because of fact the books and that they are boring in my view), it is so dazzling I guess you will under no circumstances study a sequence that speedy back.
2017-01-03 05:06:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by graney 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was the same as CoS, where Harry was (and still is) a true Gryffindor and is in need of assistance, which was provided in the form of Dumbledore's phoenix - Fawkes - and the old, battered Sorting Hat. Neville needed the same doing but minus Fawkes.
2007-07-27 13:05:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only a true Grryfindor can pull that sword out of the hat, and since he stood up to a former Slytherin he was a true Gryffindor.
2007-07-27 12:51:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chris 2
·
1⤊
0⤋