http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=3417692
What ever happened to our national sovereignty? What ever happened to the rule of law? Heck, what ever happened to common sense?
According to the mayor, he was asked if he called the president of Mexico to see if it was okay to crack down on illegals.
WHAT IN BLAZES?
I hate liberalism. It's going to destroy this country.
2007-07-27 10:45:21 · 9 answers · asked by Daniel A: Zionist Pig 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Liger, that's the whole point!
The federal government already HAS laws like this, they just don't enforce them! The mayor only proposed this ordinance so the city could enforce what the federal government should be enforcing.
2007-07-27 11:10:20 · update #1
What are you talking about _?
Certainly everyone has a right to run a business, but they don't have a right to employ or harbor illegal immigrants.
2007-07-27 11:14:55 · update #2
Yep, liberalism is a mental disorder. The illiberals can't wait to kill America by flooding it with third world garbage.
2007-07-27 10:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by qwert 7 · 3⤊ 9⤋
Exactly. In the case of immigration it is NATIONAL sovereignty, not city sovereignty. The city law violates the Constitution that gives control of immigration to the federal government. That is why the judge had to find the law un-constitutional. Maybe the city should just enforce the federal law instead of dreaming up their own.
2007-07-27 17:51:45 · answer #2 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
The court was right to overturn the law. Business permits should not exist in the first place (everybody's natural right to run a business and to own their property should be protected), so they certainly should not be taken away for hiring illegal immigrants. Nor should landlords be fined for renting to illegal immigrants.
Governments have no right to keep people from using land which is either "public property" (meaning unowned) or going on land which they have permission to go on. A policy of open borders is just as wrong as a policy of closed borders. Under a pure free market (which is what should be in place), all land would eventually be owned and nobody would be allowed to trespass on land.
The answer to the immigration question is obvious. We should privatize all land by permitting anybody to take any unowned land that they wish to take. Once all land is owned, nobody will be able to immigrate unless they have permission from the landowners of the land that they wish to pass through.
2007-07-27 18:03:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It was not ruled illegal to discriminate against illegal immigrants. It was only ruled unconstitutional because the judge stated that only the federal government can make laws regarding immigration. They're appealing it.
2007-07-27 17:50:20 · answer #4 · answered by LIGER20498 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I certainly don't hate liberals but I don't like the way they are trying to change all of laws and morals of the nation as they see fit. We cannot pander to all the indivduals wants without hurting someone elses freedoms just so they can gather all their votes. I see now where the Islamic people want all tax payers to provide them a private school. What next?
2007-07-27 17:58:03 · answer #5 · answered by question212 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Pretty much a circle jerk, huh? The feds are in charge and are doing nothing, but no one else can clean up the mess.
2007-07-27 17:54:27 · answer #6 · answered by RP McMurphy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rule of law?
How about innocent people being held at Gitmo?
How about my rights to check out any book I want without it being uploaded to some computer and me being put on a watch list?
How about basic human rights?
2007-07-27 17:50:26 · answer #7 · answered by Summer 4 · 4⤊ 6⤋
Liberals are weak and unintelligent human beings, period.
2007-07-27 17:51:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
I hate liberalism too.
2007-07-27 17:48:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 8⤋