I think that Biden showed that he was ready to lead, he was strong, and told the truth. I think the debates will give a little boost to Biden, and take away from Edwards, because all he did was suck up and praise the other candidates. Hillary versus Obama, was like Obama telling the public he is trying to win the primaries, Hillary told the public she is ready to win the election. She was one step ahead, and more confident than Barack and his answers that seemed to lack confidence. Hillary won, Biden looks like a good VP, Barack was good, Richardson was OK, just a little scared to jump in and say what he had to say. Gravel, Kucinich, and Edwards were mediocre performances....Hillary also showed she was compassionate, and backed up her argument for being a leader.....
The questions of the night were asked to Hillary about Bush Clinton Bush Clinton, she knocked that one dead, and do you think the world is willing to negotiate and deal with a woman president. She killed that but what else do you expect from the front runner?
Hillary Won, Richardson and Obama tied second
2007-07-27 09:53:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The video/web question angle is a joke. There has been 'man on the street' questions for years.
These forms of debate do not allow for a proper discussion of an issue. They are nothing more than a group of 30-60 second soundbites. But hey, us suckers seem to prefer not to have to think too much about stuff.
2007-07-27 16:10:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phil 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought the debate showed us the future of politics. Even though it wasn't that great, and there were tons of things that could have been improved, the future of politics is in technology that allows everybody to partcipate and have a voice beyond their vote.
2007-07-27 16:07:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by lxjluxl 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am completely disillusioned with all the dem candidates. The front runners are the worst of all. Hillary, Osama, Edwards...Jeez..the are people who should NOT be president under any circumstances!!!
I'm going independent until a righteous candidate comes up.
2007-07-27 16:05:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Support Mike, pass this video along, e-mail it! Get the word out! Mike is awesome and if the media won't give him tube time, we have to do all we can to spread the word! After almost 7 years of having a crook and a lier in the White House, it's great to hear Mike tell it like it is! Thanks, Angela Taylor
youtube.com/watch?v=Jy3XLCq3hto
2007-07-27 16:17:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by perrrfection 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think the candidates were licking their chops when they heard that the debate questions would be asked by people of the intelligence of the average American.
2007-07-27 18:08:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
When all is said and done, the only candidate who could be president out of that sorry lot is Joe Biden, he spoke with common sense and with details.
2007-07-27 16:08:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Greg 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
They didn't ask any hard questions. No how to get out of Iraq questions, no questions on illegal immigration. The worst question was to hitlery and osama obama about how she isn't a woman and he isn't black enough. WTF does that have to do with anything? Absolutely terrible choices for questions.
2007-07-27 16:04:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by danzahn 5
·
0⤊
1⤋