Because the Republican Party is good at playing to peoples' fears, and because the Republican Party has emphasized social issues that appeal to working class voters, even though as soon as the Republicans get into office, they spend most of their efforts helping the rich and screwing the middle class.
2007-07-27 08:10:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by rollo_tomassi423 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
The real agenda of the Republican Party is the concentration of more and more wealth in fewer and fewer hands, and corporate control of every aspect of America, from lawmaking to the economy. This is absolutely the worst thing for working class Americans.
To vote Republican you'd have to be either a millionaire or a fool.
2007-07-27 08:13:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's not. They never met a big corporation donating campaign money that they didn't like. They put through big tax cuts, which sound great, but they benefit the wealthy much more than the American Working Class. They also gave huge tax cuts to the oil industry---billions of dollars!
They also want to put an end to inheritance taxes, which their propaganda machine calls the "Death Tax". This would benefit the wealthiest Americans most, so people like Paris Hilton won't be taxed on their inheritance.
2007-07-27 08:15:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's the Democratic party. They typically support unions, middle and lower class workers, social programs, etc. Republicans are generally for big business
2007-07-27 08:11:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by sig 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They're not! The Republican party is the party of the rich, the privileged, and the never to be held accountable.
2007-07-27 08:13:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by hohn m 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
because of the fact wealthy human beings supply us jobs is the main basic clarification i could supply. Even Democrats have self assurance in trickle down economics, that's why they have self assurance in Keynsian theory (stimulus applications, bailouts). the money multiplier isn't a fantasy, that's barely difficult to be certain in action on the 2nd because of the fact the wealthy do no longer look spending. i actual do think of lots of our financial project is the warfare, warfare constantly has an consequence on the economic device. Bush and Obama could've the two appeared lots greater suited if no longer for 9/11 and the resultant warfare that maintains to be occurring today. i'm no longer wealthy yet i'm no longer against being wealthy, if we undertake socialism day after today do you think of there is not any wealthy human beings in any respect? there's a hierarchy, i'm surprisingly advantageous we are the two going to be on the backside of it for our finished lives.
2016-10-19 07:26:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by svendsen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a working class family I think the republican party's tax breaks really help us. The democrats always seem to have another tax they want to stick us with.
2007-07-27 08:25:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by froghugger 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Where do you get that malarkey?
I worked 33 years in blue-collar skilled trades, and I GUARANTEE YOU; the Democrats outnumbered the Republicans.
2007-07-27 09:34:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Poo poop dee doo............
If this is a joke or satyr it's a good one.
If you are serious, then you are either trying to sell a albatross to people here on YA, or you truly are misinformed.
Your question is like asking, "Why is arsenic good for children?"
*kiss*
2007-07-27 08:14:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Marilyn 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
because we actually praise the worker, not punish him
2007-07-27 08:26:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Adam of the wired 7
·
1⤊
1⤋