English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the stats below prove the opposite? (below statistics do not include the murder of babies)

Terrorist Group Classification - Incidents
Communist/Socialist - 3805
Environmental - 83
Leftist - 434

Right-Wing Conservative - 127
Right-Wing Reactionary - 14

http://www.tkb.org/IncidentClassModule.jsp

2007-07-27 06:36:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

There is no "murder of babies."

A baby has been born. A clump of cells has not.

What a reactionary. You related to Rudolph?

********************
Here's a stat for ya:

IRAQ WAR:
About a million killed, wounded, maimed.
TWO MILLION DISPLACED.
***********************************

Oh, and the answer to your question:
Because they are.

2007-07-27 06:54:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

could point out something which is constant and might have nothing to do with right or left. on matters of national security or ostensible national security. support for regimes in which many people are killed. as to the statistics on the environmental incidences those who protect the environment do not use terrorism. also look at the military it is one of the biggest polluters on the planet. there has been no impact study as far as known into this. also might point out that anyone who asks questions about the military questions their operations or says the environment needs protection is a terrorist. some years ago therewas a Save The Whales Campaign protesters protested to save them.they were saved but could be endangered. the question is who will do it for humanity but humans. if so will those doing it be labeled terrorists. as to the numbers well as the saying goes statistics do not necessarily mean any thing as they can be slanted to fit whichever ideas are propounded. just an indicator nothing more. anarchist is a catchall phrase anyway. trade needs to be reduced to help global warming . also opposition to trade policies is called terrorism. it is odd that the left is considered to matter when the opposition is so broad there is no left. it is just ordinary people. reducing car emissions is all very well but countries need to conserve their rsources as well. seems odd for poor countries to trade with rich ones. could ask why other countries are poor while others are rich. trade disparities perhaps. as to murder of babies no one is suggesting that the addiction to warfare has caused the death of many babies as well as other humans. strange things could happen if it looks like pacifists will win though.a propaganda campaing would be launched calling them fascist-pacifists and saying that they want to opress people that their goal is to pacify people like the sinister military term''this area has been pacified''. a perversion of pacifism which is entirely different from the original meaning

2007-07-27 07:58:24 · answer #2 · answered by darren m 7 · 0 0

no longer something. A war monger is a war monger. Ideology and political celebration association are beside the point. there isn't any such animal as a 'actual' conservative. that's a fictional character made up by skill of pundits.

2016-11-10 09:35:20 · answer #3 · answered by beharry 4 · 0 0

This is just crazy. You people on the right and left are paranoid and hysterical people and spend way too much time reading about each other.

2007-07-27 06:55:22 · answer #4 · answered by cattledog 7 · 0 1

Why do we claim conservatives are violet, aggressive,
CHICKEN HAWK WAR-MONGERS, cheaters,
Drunken sailors on a spending spree on Americans
credit card...ETC...ETC...ETC...

Maybe because they've proven over and over...
THAT THEY ARE VIOLENT, AGGRESSIVE,
CHICKEN HAWKS, WAR-MONGERS,
CHEATERS...(DUH!)

2007-07-27 07:00:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers