What would you like to see done to this jackass!!
2007-07-27 04:38:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
How many wishes do I get?
I noticed that someone mentioned hunters, George Bush, and people who kill other humans. Why do so many people think that a person who cares about one issue can't care about other issues? I'm not any less concerned about humans simply because I'm concerned about non-humans. Why do so many people think that we have to prove our loyalty to humanity by only voicing concern for humans?
EDIT:
"no one gave that impression"
----Well, you said, "You might as well do that to the hunters too, which includes your president george bush. Hmm? He has also cost people their families," which is no different than if you had said that the asker should express the same anger towards hunters and George Bush. It's just one question... What do you want her to do? Fill an entire page with a list of people who anger her?
"and my response does not represent 'many' people"
----I know that. Your response only represents YOU. It simply caused me to think of similar things that many people have said.
"so if you have something you want to discuss then direct the question towards me and stop talking in third person."
----Excuse the hell out of me for not remembering that it was you, lacedoutmami, who posted the answer to which I was referring. I suppose I should make a note of people's IDs before I click "answer this question" to avoid offending anyone. Yea, right. YOU grow up.
"There are just way bigger issues than a dog fight..."
----There are bigger issues than every other issue, particularly since the importance of an issue is a matter of opinion.
"...and the asker has a serious problem for wanting to a kill a man because kennels were on his property."
----I'd like to kill a lot of people, but I wouldn't actually do it. Of course I also don't go around telling people about it either, but to each his/her own.
"-5 rating? So you want to kill a man who killed animals, but you won't a kill a man who has killed beings? You people are a$s backwards."
----Looks like the people who gave you thumbs down "hit a nerve".
2007-07-27 05:57:23 · answer #1 · answered by SINDY 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
wow, pretty severe, for someone not yet CONVICTED of the charge. Are you this passionate about abortion as well, since " tear him slowly to shreads" is what is done to the baby that is being sucked out of a womb? Or is this passion just confined to animals?
You must be president of your local ANIMAL rights and protection unit since you feel so strongly about DOG fighting? Or do you just have a hate on for Micheal Vick?
2007-07-27 12:01:12 · answer #2 · answered by Big__Red 2 · 5⤊ 4⤋
You're being a bit drastic; although I don't think he's innocent, he is innocent until proven guilty so you can wait until the verdict before you bring out your pitchfork
2007-07-27 17:43:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HIM TO GO COURT AND LET THE STORY COME OUT IN COURT AND LET THE JURY FIND HIM GUILTY OR NOT, PEOPLE IN THE PUBLIC IS ALWAYS SO IGORANT TO PUT PEOPLE GUILTY BEFORE EVEN KNOWING THE FACTS, PEOPLE SHOULD STOP AND THINK BEFORE THEY JUMP ON EVERY BAN WAGAON THE MEDIA PUTS OUT THERE. IF MIKE VICK IS GUILTY THE JURY WILL SAY THAT, NOT US
BY THE WAY, THOSE STUPID PEOPLE WHO GO OUT IN THE WOODS HUNTING FOR BAMBI AND BIRDS, SHOULDN'T THEY GO TO JAIL TO???????????????
2007-07-27 13:26:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I'd like to see him rush for 150 yrds and throw 3 touchdown passes in the superbowl.
I don't think either of us will get our wish.
2007-07-27 12:00:46 · answer #5 · answered by $0.02 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
The problem with a bear is that the bear wouldn't take his time. I say stick with the honey but use fire ants instead.
2007-07-27 11:42:29 · answer #6 · answered by Silent Suicide 3 · 9⤊ 4⤋
I understand what he did was wrong but he shouldn't lose his job for it. I have a dog myself but losing his job for something that has not been proven is a little over the edge
2007-07-27 12:09:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
You might as well do that to the hunters too, which includes your president george bush. Hmm? He has also cost people their families.
---
-5 rating? So you want to kill a man who killed animals, but you won't a kill a man who has killed beings? You people are a$s backwards.
---
Just Another Yahoo L... - Looks like I hit nerve. Grow up...no one gave that impression and my response does not represent 'many' people so if you have something you want to discuss then direct the question towards me and stop talking in third person.
---
There are just way bigger issues than a dog fight...and the asker has a serious problem for wanting to a kill a man because kennels were on his property.
---
LoL @ whiteboy
2007-07-27 11:47:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 8⤋
How dumb are you you should take the foxy out of your name and just be a MORON. Vick is going too continue to play football.
2007-07-27 11:47:01 · answer #9 · answered by La Femme Fatal 3 · 2⤊ 7⤋
I'd like to have someone pick him up and slam him to the ground, wet him and electrocute him, strangle him, then shoot him
2007-07-27 11:48:54 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 7⤊ 5⤋