2007-07-27 02:54:34 · 19 answers · asked by pacman vick 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Yes, it is super gay and extremely retarded.
2007-07-27 03:00:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is indeed little else besides a sports gossip show. It could just as easily show up on E! network. I get irritated whenever it comes on and I'd channel surf if I weren't holding out for top plays. Most of what ESPN does is great (though this First Take thing is looking about as solid as a high school morning announcement broadcast...),but this "who's now" competition is simply asinine.
2007-07-27 10:02:17 · answer #2 · answered by psyduck702 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah its like the sports gossip show. This is worse than watching women's bowling. Its one thing to debate Tom Brady vs. Peyton Manning, LT vs. LJ, Jordan vs. Kobe, or Agassi vs. McEnroe...but to compare athletes of different sports based on who they've dated or how many commercials they've been in is just plain stupid. It could have been a watchable segment if they'd compare the top 12 QBs of all time and the top 12 pitchers or top 12 tennis players of all time. But yes this segment is completely gay.
2007-07-27 09:59:27 · answer #3 · answered by thedude 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think the only thing gayer than the whole concept of "whos now" is the judges and their arguments on whos now. Did you see Jessica Beil?? She better thank God every night that she looks like she does. Cuz I tell you, she sounds pretty uneducated. And Kevin James and Adam Sandler? Now I know why I dont watch their movies. Erin Andrews? Shes just helpless. Greenberg, Wilbone, and Herbstreet are the only ones that sound like they know anything about sports.
2007-07-27 10:05:30 · answer #4 · answered by FDub 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The stupidest thing about it is the celebrity panelists. All 3 of them picked Kobe over A-Rod and Kevin James and Adam Sandler picked Kobe just cuz their Mets fans. Don't even get me started on jessica biel
2007-07-27 10:14:21 · answer #5 · answered by jsyankees12 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-07-27 11:10:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is pretty stupid. It's not like its a slow sports time either that they needed to create something to fill time within the hour. I'm not sure how you compare half the athletes they have on there. Tiger and be done with it.
2007-07-27 10:07:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not crazy about it. But, it must be tough for ESPN to find programming for all their various channels 24/7/365.
2007-07-27 09:58:59 · answer #8 · answered by Steve 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do not know the exact definition of "Super Gay", but I think "yes" is correct.
(BTW, Super Gay flies around and stylizes hair of Super Villains. Lex Luthor, due to his baldness, is his arch enemy.:))
(Is referring to comic books Super Gay?:))
2007-07-27 10:39:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Extremely. That's what happens when baseball goes down the tubes, football hasn't started yet, and you need to fill hours and hours of programming.
2007-07-27 11:05:02 · answer #10 · answered by DGS 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is really gay almost as gay as seeing bond and vicks face every 2 minutes and if it isnt them its arod
SHOW SOME GAMES ESPN CMON
2007-07-27 10:01:31 · answer #11 · answered by richie06 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋