English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should he be banned from the NFL if he gets convicted?

2007-07-27 02:19:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

13 answers

well if convicted he will probably go to jail and by the time he gets out he will be too old to make a comeback..no i don't think he should get banned...everyone has a right to earn a living..if he goes to jail and pays his debt to society then that will be enough..if he can get out and make a comeback then he should be allowed to try.

2007-07-27 02:25:43 · answer #1 · answered by Lefty 7 · 2 3

I seen on the news he is starting up a new business to aide in his legal & financial troubles. He started his own line of dog biscuits; they are going to be called Vick’s Bix. I believe they said something like 2 flavors are being developed right now with a few more coming soon afterwards. I think they said the first two flavors will be dog flavored and cat flavored but I am not that certain because I only caught the tail end of the story. I think they will be available in a few select markets by the end of the month. I will Google it and post some more information…………

2007-07-30 16:16:47 · answer #2 · answered by bakerman516 2 · 0 0

If he's convicted on all acounts he could go to jail for up to 8yrs. He'll have bigger things to worry about then if he gets banned from the NFL.

2007-07-27 08:35:52 · answer #3 · answered by cryfreedmb 2 · 1 0

If convicted, he won't have to be banned from the NFL. No team will want him. Jeff George yelled at his coach on the sideline and never played another down.

NFL teams don't mess with stuff like this.

2007-07-27 02:23:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

He should be banned before he goes to trial. He is an evil person. He doesn't deserve to be "famous". I have heard people say they will stop watching the NFL over all this. Think if everyone did that what would happen.

2007-07-27 02:32:41 · answer #5 · answered by deb 7 · 3 0

If he was convicted of raping little girls for 7 years and strangling and drowning them to death if the girls did "not perform", should he be banned?

To me, it's the same question. He killed little innocent defenseless puppies and pets are a family member just like anybody else.

As I've said in other posts, if he is innocent, he has to be the stupidest person in the world. There were kennels, dead dogs, torturing machines, dog "rape position machines" in his property for over 7 years and he said he "didn't know" what was going on? If he is truly innocent, he should be banned for stupidity.

2007-07-27 05:15:48 · answer #6 · answered by inglewood100thstreet 1 · 3 1

Banned from the NFL & thrown in jail for a LONG time. Also his millions should all be given to animal charities.

2007-07-30 10:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by Ashley 4 · 1 1

MOST OF YOU PEOPLE ARE JUST AS DUMB AS THOSE PETA FREAKS. YOU SAY VICK SHOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO PLAY IN THE NFL YET, PAC-MAN JONES WAS INVOLVED IN HAVING A MAN NEARLY KILLED, HE GETS NO JAIL TIME AND GETS TO COME BACK AFTER A YEAR....YEA! THAT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE........YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS. THERE IS NOTHING WORSE THAN HE GOVERNMENT TRYING TO GET ON T.V. IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR. ALL I HEAR IS PEOPLE SAYING: " THEY SHOULD DO TO VICK WHAT HE DID TO THOSE DOGS.....THAT JUST SHOWS HOW WARPED YOUR MINDS ARE". IF THAT STATEMENT IS TRUE THAN THE LAWS WOULD APPLY EQUALLY TO HUMANS AND ANIMALS, THEN AGAIN YOU MORONS WOULD AGREE WITH THAT I'M SURE. APPARENTLY THE WAY YOU SH** HEADS ARE ALL TALKING HE IS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT.

P.S. YOU HEAR PEOPLE SAY THAT THIS STORY IS RACIALLY DIVIDED ......NO. I TOTALLY SUPPORT MICHAEL VICK.

2007-07-28 10:32:42 · answer #8 · answered by collegewoman_101 3 · 0 2

Absolutely

2007-07-27 02:22:51 · answer #9 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 2 0

Without question. If convicted he is nothing but a cancer to the league.

2007-07-27 05:35:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers