2007-07-27 02:01:28 · 5 answers · asked by kittana! 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Being ordinary is a bliss.... in pursuit of the extraordinary, one may end up abnormal.
2007-07-27 02:34:26 · answer #1 · answered by small 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ooh toughy....I think I'd pick glory. Because fame could be really negative....think about it. Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan: these people are famous in our society. Do you want to be recognized as that? Of course it could be a positive fame, but I wouldn't take the chance.
2007-07-27 09:12:04 · answer #2 · answered by .:Curiouser_and_Curiouser:. 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be known for being the smartest most handy person on the planet, ever! Fame and glory are for egos and greed satisfaction. I choose neither of the two offered thank you.
2007-07-27 10:02:20 · answer #3 · answered by samhillesq 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's the real difference?
Glory or heroic anonymity? Now, there's a difficult choice for some.
2007-07-27 09:18:16 · answer #4 · answered by el_dormilon 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
both, what say?
2007-07-27 09:34:36 · answer #5 · answered by Aqua 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋