English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Of course O.J. is a murderer! But we all have our opinions. What's yours?

2007-07-26 19:16:47 · 9 answers · asked by Bella Z 3 in News & Events Other - News & Events

9 answers

Kind of a great irony. It is the race issue, blacks in LA against LAPD, all that animosity between whites and blacks that helped OJ go free. Former football player who had white girlfriend, who made millions and far far from typical blacks in poor parts of LA who saw OJ's case as white racist cop setting up black man for a crime. People did have reasons to be angry at LA cops, but they freed the wrong dude.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/oj/

2007-07-26 20:01:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I was in a hospital bed paralyzed, I watched every minute of the trial. The thial was a travesty of justice and was about the criminologists and the lab techs, not O.J. O.J. was a sideline issue that The judge allowed to continue day after day, even though it was brought up continually by the news media.

I couldn't believe myself, the mistakes the lab continually made while investigating the case. I think the trial should have been help up or, a postponement should have been called for the criminologists to get their act together.

Then again Ito let so much water over the dam for the defense that should have been put on the stand, I was so frustrated at times that I was asked to turn the T.V. off by the nurses due to stress.

I am a Lab technologist and I could see so many things that happen, that should have never been allowed by Ito, but he just kept steam rolling the prosecutors office and making a mockery out of them and the detectives.

O.J. wasn't on trial here, it was the Lab, the detectives and the justice system. I don't know how Ito's wife, whom is a high police official when last heard, could hold her head up in public.

2007-07-27 02:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 1 0

No doubt in my mind that he is guilty. He was a wife beater & showed himself to be a violent man. He stalked. If those aren't the characteristics of a murderer (or murderer to be) I don't know what is.
I believe he showed his guilt during the "chase" with a gun & threatened to kill himself.
As far as the glove is concerned, I could ball up my fist & not be able to wear my gloves either. Or when my arthritis acts up my hand becomes swollen.
Its unfortunate the police planted evidence but I'm sure the only reason they did so was to insure that he didn't get off. Back-fired didn't it?
I also don't believe race was an issue until Cochran made it one.

2007-07-27 03:29:14 · answer #3 · answered by Judith 6 · 1 0

Yes.

2007-07-27 02:20:17 · answer #4 · answered by Keith 6 · 1 0

Probably, but we will never know for sure in this lifetime.

2007-07-27 03:43:31 · answer #5 · answered by the old dog 7 · 1 0

i think so it just show's u if your rich u can get away with murder.

2007-07-27 09:58:14 · answer #6 · answered by Gone 7 · 1 0

if he did would he still be out there searchin' for the real killer

2007-07-27 03:35:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes he sure did it

2007-07-27 02:20:15 · answer #8 · answered by daramint 3 · 1 0

he did it

2007-07-27 02:34:32 · answer #9 · answered by shesmypunk 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers