Would settlement in host countries for Palestinian refugees be a better option than returning to Israel?

Answer 1

Certainly.

They share the same culture, history, language and religion as the other Arabs of Middle East.
The Moslem Middle East is a vast territory 1.5x that of the United States, with the nice addition of seas of liquid gold running under it.

The Arabs (and their backers in the West) purposefully perpetuate the Arab-Israeli Conflict by REFUSING to resettle these Arabs, and forcing them to live in slums, as a constant weapon against Jewish independence.

About 900,000 Jews were welcomed into Israel (when it was very young and very poor) after being expelled from Arab countries.
The Arabs and the world don't care about displaced Arabs - they just want the war to continue, period.

Answer 2

Actually when the British gave part of Israel to the Jews after the Holocaust, the country of Jordan was set up to be the country for the Arabs and Israel for the Jews. But it didn't work, people being people. The Palestine is actually a place, and until the need to provide the Jews with a homeland became an imperative, there were no Palestinians--there were the different people and religious groups all living in the Palestine--some Arab, some Jew,
some other things. The division itself created an artificial group called Palestinians.

Maggie

Answer 3

Actually, it's the Isrealites that should go to host countries. The Palestinians actually are the rightful people for the West Bank land. There never has been a nation and land that was Isreal. That's a biblical myth. The Palestinians were disenfranchised.

Answer 4

Yes, it would but that would mean that many of the Palestinians living in those nations would have to stop living off UN assistance and start integrating into their societies.

It pretty much has happened in Jordan, and it should happen in Syria and Iraq, but its not going to happen in Lebanon. Another solution will have to be worked out for them.