English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There are strong arguments in favor and against death penalty.
Favor. The penalty of death penalty is constitutional because it not more severe than the effect on the victim.
Opponents.All killings are wrong. Life without parole will always stop a murderer from doing more killing.

2007-07-26 16:48:44 · 9 answers · asked by NBA Man 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

9 answers

I was pro-death penalty for a long time, but I have changed my stance over the years, for several reasons:

1. By far the most compelling is this: Sometimes the legal system gets it wrong. Look at all the criminals who are being released after years of imprisonment because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. No matter how rare it is, the government should not risk executing one single innocent person.

Really, that should be reason enough for most people. If you need more, read on:

2. Because of the extra expense of prosecuting a DP case and the appeals process (which is necessary - see reason #1), it costs taxpayers MUCH more to execute prisoners than to imprison them for life.

3. The deterrent effect is questionable at best. Violent crime rates are actually higher in death penalty states. This may seem counterintuitive, and there are many theories about why this is (Ted Bundy saw it as a challenge, so he chose Florida – the most active execution state at the time – to carry out his final murder spree). Personally, I think it has to do with the hypocrisy of taking a stand against murder…by killing people. The government becomes the bad parent who says, ‘do as I say, not as I do.’

4. There’s also an argument to be made that death is too good for the worst of our criminals. Let them wake up and go to bed every day of their lives in a prison cell, and think about the freedom they DON’T have, until they rot of old age. When Ted Bundy was finally arrested in 1978, he told the police officer, “I wish you had killed me.”

5. The U.S. government is supposed to be secular, but for those who invoke Christian law in this debate, you can find arguments both for AND against the death penalty in the Bible. For example, Matthew 5:38-39 insists that violence shall not beget violence. James 4:12 says that God is the only one who can take a life in the name of justice. Leviticus 19:18 warns against vengeance (which, really, is what the death penalty amounts to). In John 8:7, Jesus himself says, "let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

2007-07-30 02:15:12 · answer #1 · answered by El Guapo 7 · 0 0

I am against the death penalty because it is not an effective way to prevent or reduce crime and because it risks executing innocent people. Here are answers to questions about practical aspects of the death penalty system, with sources listed below.

What about the risk of executing innocent people?
124 people on death rows have been released with evidence of their innocence.

Doesn't DNA keep new cases like these from happening?
DNA is available in less than 10% of all homicides. It is not a guarantee against the execution of innocent people.

Doesn't the death penalty prevent others from committing murder?
No reputable study shows the death penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death penalty is neither. Homicide rates are higher in states and regions that have it than in states that do not.

So, what are the alternatives?
Life without parole is now on the books in 48 states. It means what it says. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life without parole is less expensive than the death penalty.

But isn't the death penalty cheaper than keeping criminals in prison?
The death penalty costs much more than life in prison, largely because of the legal process. Extra costs include those due to the complicated nature of both the pre trial investigation and of the trials (involving 2 separate stages, mandated by the Supreme Court) in death penalty cases and subsequent appeals. There are more cost effective ways to prevent and control crime.

What about the very worst crimes?
The death penalty isn’t reserved for the “worst of the worst,” but rather for defendants with the worst lawyers. When is the last time a wealthy person was sentenced to death, let alone executed??

Doesn't the death penalty help families of murder victims?
Not necessarily. Murder victim family members across the country argue that the drawn-out death penalty process is painful for them and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative.

So, why don't we speed up the process?
Over 50 of the innocent people released from death row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.

But don’t Americans prefer the death penalty as the most serious punishment?
Not any more. People are rethinking their views, given the facts and the records on innocent people sentenced to death. According to a Gallup Poll, in 2006, 47% of all Americans prefer capital punishment while 48% prefer life without parole.

2007-07-27 12:00:26 · answer #2 · answered by Susan S 7 · 0 0

Absolutely. However, I do not believe it should be issued as a sentence unless a JURY issues it (which would require a jury for all sentencing where death penalty was on the table, even if the original trial had no jury). I think you reap what you sew.

2007-07-26 23:54:39 · answer #3 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 0 0

Don't believe in death penalty!

2007-07-30 14:01:55 · answer #4 · answered by ajnme 3 · 0 0

I am against the death penalty.


God spared Adam.
God spared Cain.
God spared Saul and converted him to a Saint.

I am not a Bible banger. But,those who live by "Eye for an Eye" forget these simple facts.

2007-07-28 21:10:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For deliberate, premeditated, murder without provocation or mitigation. - Yes
As to life without parole...Death is kinder.

2007-07-27 00:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by Irv S 7 · 0 0

i'm all for death penalty / capital punishment. there has to be certain level of distinction between differing level of severity of crime.

2007-07-26 23:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I do. I would add child molesters and drug dealers to the list.

2007-07-26 23:59:28 · answer #8 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 0 0

death penalty for 1,2,3 and child polesters and robbery and anything else that has to do with hurting someone else !!!!!

2007-07-26 23:52:42 · answer #9 · answered by Diane D 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers