Just checking like all the other spell checkers that are so cynical.
2007-07-26 15:09:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I never said he was an idiot.
2007-07-26 15:13:32 · update #1
My grammer is correct its an instead of a dummy.
2007-07-26 15:14:08 · update #2
Funny even an american lawyer doesn't know his grammer. lol
2007-07-26 15:21:15 · update #3
Hey wait a min. Someone changed my question around. You guys don't play fair. If you are not cheating i guess your not playing hard enough.
2007-07-26 15:27:06 · update #4
What a lame trick.
2007-07-26 15:28:22 · update #5
Someone changed my question i am serous thats why i hate this yahoo thing nothing but a bunch of cheaters and liars.
2007-07-26 15:30:20 · update #6
like playing a muiltiplayer game and then someone puts a cheat code in. Well i guess thats it i quit good luck. Off to my life without yahoo and its lame cheaters.
2007-07-26 15:32:00 · update #7
Your grammar (grammar has two A's in it) is not correct. You don't put the word 'AN' in front of a word that starts with a consonant. The word 'AND' between 'Qualye' and 'Idiot', should be the word 'AN'. Plus, you need a comma after 'idiot', and your second sentence is a run on sentence.
Your sentence, "My grammer is correct its an instead of a dummy." Makes no sense. Another run on sentence.
As for Quayle. Just because he couldn't spell a word or two, does not make him an idiot. Just means that he's not the best at spelling.
2007-07-26 15:23:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No your grammar is wrong, the question should be.
Was Dan Quayle *an* (not and) idiot.
Dan Quayle was very intelligent, at the spelling bee, he was told that in that part of the country potato was spelled potatoe which in truth if it ended with an 's' would be plural.
When Quayle was debating Al Gore and Al was talking about tax increases for the rich he (Al) quoted a figure which Quayle immediately disputed and spit out the various increases at each income rate and proceeded to tell Gore that in order to raise the amount of money they were talking about they would have to raise the taxes on every person that made over $30,000 per year.
You may not be old enough to remember but Dan Quayle was right on target and that is exactly what Clinton/ Gore did, I suppose that they thought that a person that makes $30,000 a year is rich.
I would have no problem with Dan running as President, he is better that any of the current candidates on both sides of the political fence.
2007-07-26 22:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dan Quayle was actually a very smart man look you dont get to the US Senate by being an idiot get over the name calling people
2007-07-26 22:12:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You say potato, I say potatoe. The Quayle affair was political hackery at it's finest. It is incidents like that and people's love of them that has made it impossible to have a civilized debate on issues anymore. The political scene has just become like a game of schoolyard one upsmanship. "So's your old man".
2007-07-26 22:22:57 · answer #4 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets see he was a republican right. The media will always say they are dumb. Regan was too old , Bush was a wimp and out of touch, Quayle to young and dumb. Bush JR is an Idoit, Nixxon was dumb, ford was clumsy .
See a trend?
2007-07-26 22:19:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The word potato was mispelled on the card the teacher gave Dan Quayle.
Get your facts straight.
2007-07-26 22:22:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Really? You obviously can get to the White House by being an idiot.
2007-07-26 22:15:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are you serious? Were you eating and apple while criticizing Dan for being and idiot?
2007-07-26 22:27:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I did not care much for Quayle, but being that I can not spell myself, I do have some sympathy, but then again I did not have his advantages
2007-07-26 22:19:53 · answer #9 · answered by jean 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are YOU an idiot for using incorrect grammar?
2007-07-26 22:13:27 · answer #10 · answered by American Man 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋