2007-07-26 15:06:51 · 9 answers · asked by Lizzie 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Yes he took steroids - he testified to that before a grand jury. Nothing will happen to his home run record - records are records and are not subject to argument. Whether or not he took steroids, he still will have hit more home runs then anyone in baseball history. Nothing will change that other then someone else hitting more then he ends his career with.
End of discussion.
2007-07-27 05:01:37 · answer #1 · answered by artistictrophy@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in spite of the fact that wdean has a valid factor, the reality maintains to be that one million.Barry has by no skill examined effective for something. 2. there have been no written rules in baseball on the time of the only season race approximately any style of supplementations. 3. no remember how solid, or how "juiced" you're, hand eye coordination is what receives you living house runs. without which you're in simple terms whiffing on the ball. Now i'm no Bonds fan by skill of any skill, in actuality i'm a Mets fan, yet He has performed extra video games then Ruth or Arron, so might you think of he ought to get extra HRs? One final factor. lookup Barrys dad. From his rookie twelve months to his retirment his physique replaced interior the precise comparable way that Barry's did. replace into he employing 'roids to?
2016-11-10 08:50:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He used them, but they were not banned or illegal to use in MLB at the time. That means that everyone that used HGH or steroids during that period are free and clear of any penalty. Any records that were set are also going to be recognized.
Drug use is bad, but if the commissioner had banished drugs or made their use illegal, then the players would be in the wrong. HGH and steroids, plus other drugs were made illegal after that time.
2007-07-27 09:00:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you look at a picture of him when he first joined the Giants he was like 170 pounds....max. Now look at him....Huge arms,legs,and his head is freakish. Looks like a orange on a toothpick. Plus hus excuse was lame. He took the clear which he thought was flak seed oil. Flak seed oil looks like urine. But, he hasn't failed a drug test....so maybe he didn't.
Unless he outright admits using steroids, nothing will happen with his record. Even after he shatters it, I think he's safe.
2007-07-26 15:16:21 · answer #4 · answered by phister5 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the truth is so clear. senate committte, consequla told all and even as much as i hate it the cardinals mcqujire needs to own up and all of them bbelong in a different hall of fame. not with babe ruth and hank aaron. aint right. at least pete rose didnt need drugs. he is still out andthe sobs are going right in with their drug induced stats. crrap.
lets let the next big strong class of guys take all the steroids they want and see if tjhye somehow are the next homerun kings not fair? fair? gotta be fair if fair for mcquire and bonds and the rest. drugs are okay just keep the reocrd books and hall of fame buildings separate. pete rose goes in, all the druggies are puloled out.
2007-07-26 15:13:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
its kinda obvious. look at a picture of old barry and new barry, and you decide. he obviously did. but thats just circumstancial evidence. you cant get someone with that. if so, all of his homeruns he has hit since he started steroids would be earsed (quite a few)
hope this helps :)
2007-07-26 15:17:05 · answer #6 · answered by base2ball2boy2 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, even though everyone denies it. Unfortunately, they ca't prove it anymore because the evidence is gone, so he'll be the *home run king*.
2007-07-26 15:10:01 · answer #7 · answered by JT 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes (well, probably).
Nothing.
2007-07-26 16:25:03 · answer #8 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*
2007-07-26 16:02:09 · answer #9 · answered by drummaboy31 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋