why is there so much hate about differences??? Is it so hard to just "be" I guess people just don't get it.. LIVE LOVE PEACE! and all can be grand.
2007-07-26 15:06:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't hate someone because of their race, I just hate stupid people.
The reason is because it was designed by those in power during the slave days. The concept of race is scientifically false, but was created to degrade Africans to being less than human. Some much so that they would put more value on livestock than a slave. The concept also amazingly made whites the ultimate race.(yeah right)
When most of the working class people would intermingle, the rich did not want to see it. The concept of divide and conqure is still used today.
Ghettos where created to keep the poor in one location, and away from most white hoods.
The solutions is to stop looking at Race in genral.
2007-07-26 15:11:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ah, just read Neenie's answer and you will know why there is racial hatred. I would say go read that book from the 70's, "The Screwing of Practically Everybody" in which the author states that the worst enemy of the U.S. is not China nor Russia, but its own Government; the worst enemy of China is the Chinese government; the worst enemy of Russia is the Russian govenment...Get the point?
When the Government insists on forcing people to do things, hatred results. In south Florida, in order to have racial parity in public schools, children from age 3 are forced to ride buses for as long as 3 hours morning and 3 hours afternoons. Do you really think that makes whites and blacks feel more kindly towards each other?
But, sorry, some life styles are better than others...if you don't believe it, you haven't seen much of the world. Believe me, if you sleep on a dirt floor with bugs, spiders and snakes crawling across you while you are asleep...going hungry, so hungry another person can see you ribs; when it rains, you get wet, inside the house...Oh, yeah! There is a vast difference in life style.
I would say the silly thing of it is that probably almost every one is of mixed racial ancestry! But, hey, whites hate whites; blacks hate blacks; yellows hate yellows; browns hate browns; reds hate reds. That's just the way it is, until the end of time.
What we need is less Government and more Kum Baya!
2007-07-26 15:13:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The strongest and most public one right now is political bigotry.
We're not secure yet in our freedoms. We are still threatened by words.
I can talk to a white supremest and have a nice conversation, and do the same with a black supremest, someone who is against all racism, etc.
The ideas aren't a problem. It's the hatred on top of it. It's fear underneath it. Its the self-image that is constantly challenged in a country where people are free to walk away from a person as if their ideas are worthless.
Most (not all) of us haven't become comfortable with freedom, yet.
We will. We're hitting some bumps. We'll make it just fine.
2007-07-26 15:17:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gee, let's think about this, shall we?
-I don't hate blacks. But I do hate the people who are low life yellowbellied criminals, and a majority of them are black. It's a known fact, not a racist opinion. Walk into any jail anywhere, and you'll see for yourself that most of the people are black or colored. I also hate the fact that some blacks [some not all] believe that we as white people "owe them something" because we "tortured" their ancestors. I will admit slavery is a horrible, horrible thing, but that was the way of life back then, it was abolished, and now there is not a trace of that kind of slavery in this entire country.
-Secondly, homosexuality is a sin. People can CHOOSE if they want to be gay or straight. Now I do not hate GLBT people. I HATE their sin, and the fact that they think their sin should be accepted. It's like asking someone to accept murder or thievery. No. It's not right.
-We as humans are supposed to love one another: it's one of God's commandments. However, we do not have to love one another's sins.
2007-07-26 15:15:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why should I totally accept a lifestyle, say, if someone chooses to change their sex, like a Transgendered? If I think it's stupid, and I do, then why should I accept some guy who decided to be a girl? Or some girl who finds the need to surgically attach a penis?
The fact that some people find that odd, or even disturbing, is something that the person lopping off their "unit" is going to recognize that the choice to do so is going to make some people look at them strange.
As far as race, there is no reason for hate.
2007-07-26 15:08:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Genetics.
In order to have survived as a species, we must have been the type of being that competes for the survival of our own genetic type. There may have been many species who did not have a built in preference for the reproductive success of their own kind, but they have... all died out apparently. That statement tends to make more sense the longer one thinks about it.
Please notice that I did NOT say that was a "good" or "bad" thing. It is just a plausible and unemotional explanation for the existence of racism. I don't happen to like this explanation, but it seems to me to be the most likely explanation for the reality.
The problem is that sometimes genetic diversity is a positive force in the survival of a species. And it is hard for simple people to see the difference between "different" and "diverse"
2007-07-26 15:13:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Master B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Racism will end when we finally realise that it is a two edge sword and there are groups who hate white people who are racist as well as whites who hate other groups
The problem being that people throw the r word around for simply disagreeing with them
case in point illegal immigration
Its not a race issue its a law and order issue
2007-07-26 16:29:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't agree that there is that much hate in America to other races I travel to Latin America ,Asia and Europe They don't even look at each other greet each other as we Americans do Sure we have some mis trust but When I'm back state side I see that races get along much better there!
2007-07-26 15:10:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
there is only one race, the human race, the differences are in ethnicity's, and each one values their culture but some value it way to much to the point of devaluing others.
i believe the majority of people, regardless of ethnicity want the same, food, shelter, spending money, education for their children to succeed, and for their teenagers not to hate them.
i don't see what you seeing on the level you seem to see it.
2007-07-26 15:11:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Truth about the Talmud
A documented exposé of Jewish Supremacist hate literature
http://www.gooff.com/NM/templates/Conscious_Solutions.asp?articleid=151&zoneid=3
http://www.hoffman-info.com/talmudtruth.html
The Trillion-Dollar Fraud
http://englishatheist.org/indexz62.shtml
Talk for Atheist Alliance, Easter 1999, Austin, Texas reprinted in
Think of the amazing number of supernatural beliefs held by people:
Gods, goddesses, devils, demons, angels, heavens, hells, purgatories, limbos, miracles, prophecies, visions, auras, saviors, virgin births, immaculate conceptions, resurrections, bodily ascensions, faith-healings, exorcisms, salvation, redemption, messages from the dead, voices from Atlantis, omens, magic, clairvoyance, spirit-signals, divine visitations, incarnations, reincarnations, second comings, judgment days, astrology horoscopes, psychic phenomena, extra-sensory perception, telekinesis, voodoo, fairies, leprechauns, werewolves, vampires, zombies, witches, warlocks, ghosts, wraiths, poltergeists, dopplegangers, incubi, succubi, palmistry, tarot cards, ouija boards, levitation, out-of-body travel, magical transport to UFOs, Elvis on a flying saucer, invisible Lemurians in Mount Shasta, Thetans from a dying planet, etc., etc.
The New Testament Did Not Exist!
http://www.new4y.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=12
Have you ever thought of what Christianity would be today if we had no New Testament? Perhaps, one might question if there would be such a faith as the Christian faith without the New Testament.
What do you suppose might happen if all the New Testaments were to vanish? Could we go on? Could we survive?
Yet, the early church, from the days of the apostles till the fourth century had no New Testament as a collection of 27 books. There are two things the so-called "New Testament Church" did not have.
The first thing is the New Testament and the second is "a church”. Primal Christians had only the Torah. The five books of Moses.
They had the twenty-two books of the Prophets and Holy Writings that included Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah and the two books of Chronicles.
They had the twenty-two books of the Prophets and Holy Writings that included Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah and the two books of Chronicles.
Then, of course, they had and used the fourteen books of the Apocrypha. They met and worshipped with the Jews in the Synagogues.
Many times we read in the New Testament statements such as:
" . . . the scripture saith . . ..." Or
" . . . it is written . . . .." Or
" . . . what saith the law . . . .." Or
" . . . thus saith the L-rd . . . .." Or
" . . . as the prophet said . . . .."
When many read these statements, they think it is referring to Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, or one of the New Testament epistles.
Not so!
The New Testament did not exist in those days. The only scripture they had was the Tanach and Apocrypha.
The New Testament church only had the Hebrew Scripture.
If there was a church in your community by any name, who had a sign in front that read:
"This church only teaches from the Old Testament" what would be the response of the community? What would be your response? Would you dare to visit that church? Would you consider becoming a member?
Do you think that church's pastor would be invited to join the local ministerial association? Probably not!
Yet, can we not put that sign on every church mentioned in Acts and the Pauline epistles?
Any church today that posted and practiced such a sign "we only study the Old Testament" would be considered a cult or an occult.
Some people would become very angry immediately, not giving it a second thought and brand it as heresy.
While when the more moderate would only feel a little sick at the stomach for such a blatant statement.
They would be turned off by such a thought. That is only natural!
That is exactly the response the primitive churches got from their communities!
Do you know of any church today dedicated to in-depth constant study of the Torah, Prophets and Holy Writings of the Tanach or so called Old Testament?
Do you know any church that would treat the scriptures as the Older Testaments and the Newer Testaments as it was so amply state by Rabbi Zalman Shechtcher-Shalomi?
Originally the writers of the Newer Testament, all were Jewish, viewed the Older Testament of the Hebrew Scriptures as the supreme authority of what they wrote.
Much later their writings became the Newer Testament. Their authority was in Torah primarily, enforced by the Prophets and Holy Writings.
Their Newer Testament writings never showed or claimed supremacy over the Older Testament!
They did all their writing in the Jewish mind-set. This attitude always concedes all authority to the Torah!
It never irritates or challenges the authority of the Hebrew Scriptures.
Unfortunately, when the Byzantines, in the fourth century after Jesus, removed the apostolic writings from the Jewish mind-set and< forced them into a Greco Roman mind-set everything changed.
First, they collected 27 of many writings and called the collection, for the first time the "New Testament”.
The monks inverted the authority and made the "New Testament" superior to the Hebrew's sacred scripture that they titled the "Old Testament" for the first time.
This implied that the "new" had now replaced the "old”. The Jewish< Holy Scripture was now obsolete and abrogated by the New Testament.
Hereafter, the monks only used the Jewish Bible to try to prove the validity of their New Testament. They used the text they had abrogated and nullified.
The purpose of the B'nai No'ach Study Program is to help the non-Jew understand what the Word of G-d means to him. It is an attempt to get Christians to return to the scriptures and learn "the first principles of the oracle of G-d”.
B'nai No'ach is not church. It is an attempt to fill the void the church has not filled in people's lives. B'nai No'ach is not a prayer meeting nor a praise and worship event. It is not and does not take the place of church.
At all cost we must avoid making B'nai No'ach another sect or denomination. B'nai No'ach is our effort to help you to know G-d and know his living Word.
History vs. Religions.....winner History
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=928518742089256264&hl=en-old one
ZEITGEIST, The Movie - Official Release ... “SPIRIT OF THE TIME”
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331
ZEITGEIST, The Movie - Full Production (must see)
http://www.everythingburns.com/wordpress/?p=65
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
The World is a Stage – Part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7160790539111319889
2007-07-26 15:08:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋