He is hosting a cancer debate in Iowa I think, coming up in August. Then I thought, why shouldn't he be on the other side of the auditorium?
Lance is clearly a determined individual, who would work hard to solve cancer which kills 600,000 Americans a year. He is intelligent, and knows how to be bipartisan (rode with Edwards and Bush) I would vote for him, and then finally the liberals could say a good Texan President!
2007-07-26 14:51:10 · 14 answers · asked by Serpico7 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Lance is the most drug tested athlete of all time. He has NEVER failed one. God bless Lance. And I wish he stayed with Kik, but w/e.
2007-07-26 15:26:55 · update #1
nah
2007-07-26 14:58:31 · answer #1 · answered by Japhy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he is a determined individual. What do you base his intelligence on? Don't forget, it was suspected that he is a druggy...nice to be determined and commited, but not for the wrong reasons or wrong cause.
As to how many die from cancer, that is no reason to vote for a President. Millions die every year, even from hunger, and that is entirely unexcusable, but it still happens, and it is not being stopped, so why worry about 600,000 dying from cancer?
The Liberals did say a good "Texan President!": President Johnson. How much more Liberal can you get?
2007-07-26 22:26:27 · answer #2 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, what a great idea. Forget the fact he cheated to win. This would really be a good act of dimplomacy. While we are pissing off other countries cheating in sport we should send a soccer star to England with a bionic leg. Oh and then we could elect him and George Clooney president and the world would be perfect.
2007-07-26 22:47:11 · answer #3 · answered by redsox 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
the only candidate i have ever heard i really thought was jerry brown because he explained how he would avoid being corrupted by big interests by not accepting big contributions
i would never vote for a non-professional politician
colin powell might be ok because of his military experience and executive is a military job
lance armstrong has no experience so why vote for him when there are people like colin powell, condi rice, hilary, barack obama, barbara boxer, qualified and experienced people etc.
the world is a huge mess
no one is going to fix it
but at least lets not let in someone who is inexperienced
2007-07-26 22:04:06 · answer #4 · answered by thomasdavidhalbrook@yahoo.com 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I think he may have used steroids illegally (after he no longer needed them for any medical treatment). There isn't enough evidence to hold up in court, but there is enough to make me suspicious.
And Floyd Landis? His own words have convinced me beyond a doubt that he is guilty. Everything he has said is more like a guilty man covering up a crime than an innocent man falsely accused.
2007-07-26 22:07:27 · answer #5 · answered by Chance20_m 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the white version of Barry Bonds. At least Lance's excuse of taking steroids was legit (cancer).
2007-07-26 21:54:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, it's good that he cares about cancer but he is a cheater he did lots of steroids and people think of him as a hero i would not vote for him.
2007-07-26 22:18:31 · answer #7 · answered by Dana 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You mean the guy who broke up his family and his marriage for that idiot sheryl crow you mean that Lance Armstrong
helll no
2007-07-26 22:24:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Anyone that went out with Sheryl Crowe and used 1 square piece of toilet paper is too far to the left.
2007-07-26 22:05:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO WAY A bicycle geek
2007-07-26 22:37:07 · answer #10 · answered by and socialism 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would never vote for a doper.
2007-07-26 22:44:48 · answer #11 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋