Yes it is.
adj. shal·low·er, shal·low·est
Measuring little from bottom to top or surface; lacking physical depth.
Lacking depth of intellect, emotion, or knowledge: "This is a shallow parody of America" (Lloyd Rose).
Marked by insufficient inhalation of air; weak: shallow respirations.
In the part of a playing area that is closer to home plate: shallow left field.
n. A part of a body of water of little depth; a shoal. Often used in the plural: abandoned the boat in the shallows.
2007-07-26 13:56:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by ghouly05 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Perhaps a few folks need to crack open their dictionaries!
Yes, "shallower" is the standard comparative form of "shallow" (and "shallowest" is the superlative.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/shallow
I think what throws people it the fact that the TYPICAL way of forming the comparative for adjectives longer than one syllable is to say "more ----"
In other words, most one-syllable adjectives (but not all!!) add -er; most two-syllable adjectives use 'more...'
Examples:
steep >> steeper
big >> bigger
fitting >> more fitting
common >> more common
unusual >> more unusual
(one-syllable exception: fun >> more fun)
But there are many two-syllable adjectives that form comparatives by adding -er. One common type is an adjective that ends with an unaccented vowel.
This includes words ends with y (as people often know):
happy >> happier, funny >> funnier
But it ALSO includes several words ending with an /o/ sound, such as: narrower, sallower, callower
(exception - "thorougher" is technically allowed, but "more thorough" is more commonly used)
Incidentally, another set of two-syllable adjectives that may take the suffixes, is forms that end up still being pronounced as having two-syllables after the change, e.g., -ple/-ble words-- abler, humbler, simpler, nobler
2007-07-26 14:14:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by bruhaha 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, I think you would need to say more shallow.
2007-07-26 13:55:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Heidi K 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, you'd say more shallow.
2007-07-26 13:56:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by dcc045 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
nope, youd say more shallow
2007-07-26 14:05:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. At least in my dictionary.
2007-07-26 13:58:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mary W 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is.
2007-07-26 13:55:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Luciano D. 7
·
0⤊
1⤋