to stay babies and kittens to stay kittens? I think so.
2007-07-26 12:10:10 · 7 answers · asked by Amy K 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Oh yeah, let's see the benefits: crying endlessly, messy diapers, overpriced baby clothes, a new stroller every four years, to say nothing of little shoes they never walk in. No thanks.
Kittens on the other hand is another matter...
2007-07-26 12:20:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that is a REALLY bad idea. For 2 reasons:
1.) It is VERY unethical. If someone can permanently "freeze" time so a baby stays a baby for 70+ years what else can they manipulate?
2.) Most parents don't want to take care of a baby for 70+ years.
Also, I really don't want to have a "time frozen kitten", it's cruel and frankly it's a little creepy.
I mean, if I got that "time frozen" kitten as a 5 year old, I'm going to be creeped out when 10 years pass and I am 15 years old and that kitten is still a kitten.
2007-07-26 21:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by Zero 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Now why would you want to do that? Babies are cute at first but having a baby stay 1 year old FOREVER would get pretty annoying. But having baby kittens would be okay.
2007-07-26 19:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Mad scientist perhaps. The point of life is to grow, age and die. Keeping humans as babies is nothing but pure cruelty. To the baby and its parents. If you want a baby kitten, buy a stuffed kitten toy.
2007-07-26 19:18:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, that would be great. Genetically-engineered humans infants that remain small, stupid, and unable to take care of themselves until they die. Sign me up!
2007-07-26 19:14:19 · answer #5 · answered by lithiumdeuteride 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Obviously, you haven't changed many diapers...
2007-07-26 19:37:07 · answer #6 · answered by Ellie S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, you should google neotany.
2007-07-26 19:41:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋