English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

this theory had been rejected from many scientists, but my opinion is that there is some kind of possibility, but i would have a more specific answer, if i completed the advance physics, because i'm still learning the tip of the Ice Berg physics,and once again NO FORMULAS

2007-07-26 11:07:00 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

3 answers

It's not clear what, if anything, the white hole solution corresponds to in General Relativity. The problem in interpreting it is that the relationship between GR and the quantum mechanical properties of matter that goes in and out of the holes is not known. Choices include it's a meaningless solution (like a sphere with negative radius), it's just a redundant solution to a black hole, and black and white holes are opposite ends of a worm hole. Given the last interpretation, If a black hole collides with its complementary white hole, I suppose the whole thing would vanish in a burst of gravity waves. If it collided with an independent white hole, I suppose they'd still vanish, but the two holes' complementary holes would connect. No one can do more than suppose since understanding the "guts" (where matter moves) is, as I said, unknown.

2007-07-26 15:20:11 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 0 0

The concept of a white hole is not defined. A black hole will eat anything that falls into it, and does not represent a realistic time travel mechanisms because tidal forces would destroy anything involved.

2007-07-26 11:15:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What is a white hole?

They have never been observed and are not a solution to known equations - they are science fiction.

A wormhole is a solution to the field equations, but it cannot exist in our universe.

2007-07-26 11:14:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers