June 1st was my last day from job A and I finished moving 3 hours north to my new home after work. We left on OK terms. He was kind of upset I was leaving bc I was a good employee. Regardless, I started a new full time job B on the following Monday, June 4th. I was doing very well there until I was terminated bc someone stole $300 from my bank. Two weeks later, they were terminated after they caught them red handed. The day I got terminated from Job B, I filed unemployment. Because I got fired they had to investigate it, and two weeks ago got a statement saying that my determination from Job B is granting me benefits, however it was being held bc of another issue, which ended up being Job A. Now, today I get a letter in the mail saying Im not getting benefits because I moved and had to quit job A. Which really confuses me because that isn't the reason I had to file unemployment in the first place. Someone please explain to me why this is happening and what I can do to appeal it.
2007-07-26
09:44:04
·
5 answers
·
asked by
rapxo
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I dont think this is right at all. Now I have a part time job with jobs lined up for interviewing but I dont want to be out the almost 700 dollars for the three weeks after termination from job B that I had claimed. Please help!
2007-07-26
09:44:19 ·
update #1
I WAS ENTITLED BENEFITS FROM JOB B THAT I GOT FIRED FROM. I WASNT ENTITLED BENEFITS FROM JOB A, THE ONE I QUIT BECAUSE I HAD TO MOVE. DOESNT MAKE ANY SENSE!
2007-07-26
10:03:01 ·
update #2
so is this correct???? -----> I was entitled benefits from Job B but because I only worked there for three weeks, they investigated job A and since I moved they aren't entitling me benefits. when all i want is compensation for the three flippin weeks i was without a job because i was fired from job B. this is such BS!
2007-07-26
10:13:41 ·
update #3