English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush caused human suffering and death. why the public media doesn't cover this news to death rather than Vick, Bush is more of a public figure or Vick. Bush needs to be prosecuted and punished. what he did is a million times more serious than what Vick has done. i am sure many dogs have been killed in Iraq too if that what takes us to accuse Bush for a crime! don't respond emotionally but rationally

2007-07-26 09:41:20 · 14 answers · asked by macmanf4j 4 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

o.k.then, lets prosecute Bush's advisors 1st and Vick, next. now what?

2007-07-26 09:50:18 · update #1

SO LETS QUESTION OUR SYSTEM WHICH IS THE REAL CAUSE OF PUTING ALL THESE LIERS INTO OFFICE. A SYSTEM THAT ENCOURAGES VIOLENCE AGAINST ALL BEINGS FOR PROFIT AND GREED

2007-07-26 10:01:13 · update #2

14 answers

bush needs to be brought up on war crimes he is no better than milosovic after no weapons of mass destruction were found he claimed he went over there to save the people of iraq from saddam well lets go to north korea next kim jong ll is 100 times worst the real reason he went over there is to boost his political but it didnt quite work out like that he is a no good son of a b**** open your eyes bushheads

2007-07-26 09:56:14 · answer #1 · answered by jrhodtex 2 · 1 0

Its completely different to prosecute a President for war crimes that havent been committed. Its easier to convict a man that is an icon to young people and play the worlds most popular sport in front on millions of people every week, and is just a household name and bush. Besides there are witnesses in the Vick case, and Vick is a huge role model to kids that in my eyes is the number 1 reason he is being prosecuted

2007-07-26 16:46:28 · answer #2 · answered by rcass69 1 · 0 1

Because being politically misleading, or being wrong about interpretation of data, is not an impeachable offense.

There are other felonies Bush has admitted committing (18 USC 2511, 18 USC 2441, 18 USC 1001, 2 USC 192) that would be valid grounds for impeachment, since Bush could raise his affirmative defenses (justification, unitary executive, executive privilege) at trial -- that trial would be the proper way to determine guilt given the prima facie evidence already extant.

But "lying" (as many people call it) about the problems in Iraq is not a crime. It's just politics as usual.

2007-07-26 16:45:40 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 1

I take it you're from a foreign country... Maybe even a 3rd world country. President Bush is protecting America and as a standing President it is his job to do so even if it means going to war. President Bush has broken no laws what so ever. We're in a war on terror. I guess you've forgotten 911? Well, a terrorist is a terrorist and Saddam is no different from those that killed 3,000 innocent Americans. Saddam violated 17 resolutions, raped, tortured, murdered 100's of 1000's of his own people. Sorry to go on and on, but it seems like you needed a bit of an education.

2007-07-26 16:51:57 · answer #4 · answered by ks 5 · 0 2

A lie is a lie if the person knows his or her statement to be false. Bush may have really believed the WMD bologna but I'm not omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient so I can't say whether or not he lied, although I want to soooo bad because Bush is a religion infected fool.

2007-07-26 16:47:20 · answer #5 · answered by rolfsmitherines 3 · 1 1

Ok, rationally as opposed to emotionally, Bush's advisors told him things that turned out not to be true. If every President throughout history was prosecuted for listening to his advisors who later were found to be wrong, every President in our history would have served jail time.

Please take your emotional propaganda somewhere else.

2007-07-26 16:45:17 · answer #6 · answered by Harlan 2 · 2 2

Humbug, first produce a lie, then produce an "honest" liberal to prosecute him for standing up for America. beats rolling over and playing dead. Which we would be. Remember 9'11? Alqueda? Those friendly people still trying to destroy us! Leave Iraq, those radicals will follow us home. Leave the bloody war where it is.

2007-07-26 16:50:03 · answer #7 · answered by olhip48 2 · 1 2

if so, every congress women and men who voted for the war should be arrested. Dont forget, Bill Clinton should be arrested too because he started "Saddam had WMD" in the 90s and he actually fired missles into Iraq too.

2007-07-26 16:48:10 · answer #8 · answered by Samm 6 · 2 1

crime? what crime? he did what most of america and almost the entire congress wanted to do at the time, and now it is a crime because things arn't going well? it is a crime that he is trying to finnish the job we told him to do? the news networks should be charged with the crime, they give our military plans to the enemy, degrade our troops, accuse them of being murderers and rapists, and prevent us from doing what we are trained to do, kill the enemy and come home. this mess is their falt, not the presidents.

2007-07-26 16:47:45 · answer #9 · answered by John S 4 · 0 1

Bush helping to elect Hillary

2007-07-26 16:44:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers