English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok, on one side you have the Republicans who lied to get us into this endless war with Iraq, and are still lying about it.

On the other side, you have the Democrats, who ALSO lied to get us into this endless war. Now they regret it, but not quite enough to actually do anything to end it.

2007-07-26 09:32:35 · 9 answers · asked by ThatOneDude 3 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

At least Republicans do something.

Democrats want to end the war, great, we're all sick of the war. But they have no plan to deal with terrorists, they just seem to want to pretend they don't exist and I can't accept that.

2007-07-26 09:36:41 · answer #1 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2 3

( I live in Canada, excuse me. )

The Rupublicans STARTED the war in Iraq. If they had never sent troops there, then the western world would be able to stay out of it. The Democrats, I do beleive, are completely against the war in Iraq, and wish to remove troops from the country. I think that the Republicans deserved to lose the House and the Senate in the last election, they have done more bad then good.

( Last time I checked, the U.S.A. is over 2 trillion US dollars in debt from the war in Iraq alone. )

The only reason that there are terrorists in the U.S.A. is because of the war. If the troops never went there, there would most likely be less terrorists.

Bush is about nine tenths of the problem. I say out with Bush, he is ruining my neighboring country. Many members of my family live in the U.S.A. and they ALL voted against Bush and the Republicans.

2007-07-26 10:16:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, but ultimately 90% of the responsibility for the Iraq war rests on the shoulders of Bush.

He is the one with the bully-pulpit. It was his intelligence that was used to front the war. It was his party representatives calling those who didn't support the war "traitors, cowards, etc."

Lastly, Bush's war would not have started without a Republican majority in Congress supporting it.

So no matter how you try to twist it (and the American public knows better), 95% of the blame goes to the GOP elected representatives.

Sorry, but all you have to do is look at the campaign fundraising numbers to know its true.

2007-07-26 09:40:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We are at war and the democrats are banging their fists for withdrawl of troops. Hence demanding failure in Iraq
to appease a war weary nation
Both Democrats and Republicans authorized this war. Democrats have failed to stand behind this country in a time of war. Their first priority are elections not the safety of this nation.

2007-07-26 10:15:20 · answer #4 · answered by grinninh 6 · 0 0

Democrats and Republicans are an analogous. in the back of close doorways Dems and Reps are continually in contract. To something of the international, they act like they are against one yet another. This creates the phantasm there are 2 facets of ever concern. relatively, they are an analogous element. The effective government, run with the help of bureaucratic servants observed as Democrats and Republicans, comprehend that there is a eleven% approval fee of the government with the help of the U. S. electorate. it relatively is unacceptable to the Dems and Reps. they want away to coach there means. So turning out to be a terror ecosystem, gets the electorate interest. this will additionally enable them to portray they are doing some thing for the electorate that could't be saved faraway from the government. I't is a compelled attractiveness of means in all its tyranny. between the regulations of conflict while dealing with a enhanced enemy is to divide and triumph over, somewhat then to attack your enemies stress as an entire. understanding that electorate and there constitutional freedoms/rights are a thee governments outstanding enemy, turning out to be a diversionary tactic such as Republican and Democrat could divide the governments enemies "electorate + constitutional freedoms/rights" as quickly as divided, the enemy is plenty less complicated to triumph over. subsequently, as quickly as we are divided, the effective government can eliminate freedoms/rights, and enforce tyrannous rules plenty less complicated than if we've been united. Vote for all of us else as nicely Democrats or Republicans. I't may well be all of us commencing from a third social gathering candidate to Mickey Mouse. do in basic terms not vote for Democrats or Republicans. They have been offered and paid for an prolonged time in the past with the help of bureaucrats. while Dems or Reps are elected, they serve the pursuits of transnational firms that paid for them to get elected, not the electorate. I't is the appropriate performing out of a "stable cop undesirable cop" difficulty in historical past. in basic terms undergo in recommendations. The Tea social gathering is the Republican social gathering. "I'f your a multi-billion dollar transnational enterprise and additionally you pay for, a million President + 435 Congressmen + one hundred Senators + 9 outstanding court docket Justices, then you definately've total means over 350,000,000+ electorate and all there supplies."

2016-10-09 10:12:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm not sure how you figure the dems lied. They went by the intelligence that Bushco doctored up and changed to show Saddam had WMD, Nukes, and Al-qeada. EAch of those turned out to be false, Bushco knew they were false, but still used them. Unfortunately the intelligence agencies do not report to congress. If they had, the truth would have come out, and Bushco would not have been able to make up false intelligence.

2007-07-26 09:38:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

worst--liberal dems, next liberal republicans, then Blue dog dems, then regular Republicans. Really not much of a choice.

2007-07-26 09:41:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm not impartial on this.....but I fail to see how the Dems got us into this war.

This is 100% Bush and his administration.

2007-07-26 09:40:27 · answer #8 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 1 0

I can't imagine either of them doing much worse than they have so far.

2007-07-26 09:35:41 · answer #9 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers