Obama, Edwards, Hillary....which one?

Question

They are all pretty intelligent and articulate...forgetting about parties at this point...just based on the individual...which one appeals to you more?

Wouldn't it be cool if they all had to work together...a waste when just one has to win.

And I'm Canadian...so don't start calling me lefty or righty unless you want to do the hokey pokey or something.

Well I'm not going to list them ALL. You are certainly free to mention whom you prefer.

.

To Ms4...I quite agree...but he is smart enough to be able to mobilize people without being president is he not? It's amazing what you can do from the sidelines with the liberty of freedom from political parties.

Better to be the thorn in one's side sometimes...which is why you'd be better off with another party or two keeping the big guns in check.

David, what do you care whether I care or not and why. None of your beeswax is why ok? This is where I would stick out my tongue at you if I were your age.

What happens in America seems to have a wee affect on the rest of the world in case you havent noticed and unlike people like you others actually have an interest in what happens in other parts of the world.

What do YOU care about what happens in IRAQ or anywhere else for that matter...and Fred Who?

Answer 1

Obama, Hillary, and Edwards in that order.

Answer 2

I would choose Barack over Hilary or Edwards.

With Hilary you'll get no new ideas in the Presidency. She's very safe, poll driven and won't do anything that hasn't been calculated out to the nth degree. In short, the country will essentially stay the course we're but we'll have Hilary driving it. Ultimately that's not what we're looking for.

Edwards and his whole "Two Americas" line doesn't ring true from him. There are rich and poor but he's a photo op kind of guy. A "Look at me, I'm at a homeless shelter. Get my good side." kind of leader. When the camera's off, I doubt he anywhere near that other America and beyond that, he had non substance in 2004 and has no real substance now.

While I don't agree with everything out of Barack's mouth, I feel that he's going to bring a fresh, energetic perspective to the Whitehouse. Being willing to meet with the leaders of countries we have seen as enemies over the years is a positive progressive action. It's something that Reagan wasn't afraid to do, nor was Carter afraid to bring leaders together in his term as President.

In short, Barack is ready to lead us somewhere where Edwards is winging it and hoping something sticks and Hilary is ready to just continue driving the bus down the same route.

Answer 3

Edwards, can't get elected, Obama hasn't got experience and we see now how that works when we have someone in office w/no experience. Obama should wait and get more experience first..Hillary is too angry, and I don't think bringing in money means she can get elected.. Let's hope and pray Al Gore gives us another chance, He's the only candidate that is qualified (VERY) and has class,( a lot) experience ( a life's worth)and can talk to the rest of the world for us and fix what Bush broke, (everything, including our honor)..But why would he run? When the election was stolen from him, we the people let it happen and we should have been screaming in the streets to allow the Supreme court to do that to us! It was OUR election, not theirs to steal. I feel they were dead wrong to do that to us. Anyway, Until we change the laws about $$$ we'll not get a President we need, we'll get who ever can buy into office..sadly..I'm not excited about any of them so far..I'm hoping for Gore in 2008.

Answer 4

Obama = left wing amateur, a Rebel Without a Clue.

Edwards = Easy Breezy Beautiful Covergirl empty suit personal injury lawyer.

Clinton = Only First Lady in our history to have been under criminal indictment.

Intelligent and articulate? Yeah, like John Gotti or the Manson Family

Answer 5

In a 20 second audio "bite world" it is impossible to judge anyone. A 30 minute talk would allow getting to know this sleezy group first hand.
Republican myself...Duncan Hunter needs a job...a movie actor/former Senator is a good contender. Some of them are as liberal as Democrats...Republocrats. Demicans like Hillary cannot win. She has more baggage than Paris Hilton and her unknown friend I call "Berlin" riding their own freight train.

Answer 6

If I have to choose one of them I'd go with Hillary. I didn't used to like her at all, but she's the best of the 3 choices in my opinion.

Edwards is before long going to be very distracted by a dying wife and then grieving over a dead wife. Obama needs a lot more experience before he's ready for the presidency.

Answer 7

Edwards has no clue, Hillary has no soul but Obama's main problem is the number of blacks who don't take him seriously because he grew up in Hawaii and sent his kids to private school. I'd still hope for a democratic ticket of Obama and Richardson.

Answer 8

Edwards is weak.
The only good thing about Hill is Bill
And Obama is interesting, maybe I'm just jaded enough to LIKE his inexperience.

If I had to choose today, between these three...I'd probably go with Obama.

Answer 9

I can't stand any of them. they have no plan to move america in a new direction, you vote for them you'll get more of the same crap. thats why i'm voting for Dr. Ron paul who will uphold the constitution unlike these other traitors.

Answer 10

If your Canadian, what do you care about the US political system? To answer your question, Fred Thompson.