Barack?
Guiliani?
2007-07-26 07:32:07 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I'd say that she is the most fit to lead candidate there is. First, she belongs to the only decent party we have. (Not that they are all that great. kind of disappointing in many ways. But the alternative is unthinkable) And she spent 8 years right there inside the White House. And an ambitious woman like that, we can be sure, had some involvement in any and every important decision. she knows the White House. Yep, she's fit to lead. Why fear it? Can she possibly do worse than this administration we are now saddled with?
2007-07-26 07:39:26 · answer #1 · answered by Robert K 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Hell no.
Ron Paul.
Even though I disagree with some of his policies, at least he is consistent and honest, that is different from ALL the others.
Screw party politics, wouldn't it be a novel idea to vote for someone whom had a consistent track record.
Even if some of his choices are wrong to you, wouldn't it be nice to know in advance about them and know he wouldn't change on the ones you do agree with?
His choices are based on his beliefs, he has no time for special interest groups, that in itself is a refreshing change.
Also, none of the other candidates of any party like him.
Right there is all I need to know, if those B*****ds don't like him he has to be OK.
2007-07-26 14:54:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe "she" is fit to lead a dog outside to poop or a group of lemmings off a cliff...Obama is only fit at present to lead a Garden Party in the song "Kumbya"...Rudy has been the leader of a city that is larger than some countries...I think we need a man like Fred Thompson to lead this country...I'M WITH FRED!!!
2007-07-26 14:54:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. She's the devil in a blue pant suit. Obama isn't much better. Guliani is a RINO. No one listed could lead their way out of a wet paper bag, let alone our country.
2007-07-26 14:44:55 · answer #4 · answered by Karma 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Fit to lead what? Are surrender to the terrorist? Same answer for AbUma..... Only a fool would vote Democrat
2007-07-26 14:43:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is not fit to be a Senator. Let alone the President.
Giuliano comes the closest in your list.
2007-07-26 14:35:23 · answer #6 · answered by ♥♥The Queen Has Spoken♥♥ 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
None of those crooks are fit to lead.
2007-07-26 15:01:29 · answer #7 · answered by Mr.Robot 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? She is a vile, shrill, power crazed egomanical, Chavez wanna be, who will stop at nothing, including the demolishion of this country to achieve her goals. So, I guess that's a yes.
2007-07-26 14:37:24 · answer #8 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, in fact, she is very suitable to lead:
An army of ants.
A herd of cows.
A gaggle of geese.
A flock of birds.
That's 'bout all she is qualified to lead!
She lost all credibility with me when she couldn't keep her husband in line.
072607 1:43
2007-07-26 14:44:08 · answer #9 · answered by YRofTexas 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Guiliani, I hope she does not win!
2007-07-26 14:35:23 · answer #10 · answered by Mantacore 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋