English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

New World Order. one court, one currency, one education system, one media source, one religion, one police force, the world under one government
U.N. global warming pact with the US creates this U.N. Convention of Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) creates another dangerous U.N. bureaucracy, with a seabed “authority” to run ocean affairs, as well as a court system and a global tax. It is created by the World Federalists as a major stepping stone on the road to world government. It is also designed to make it easier for the “international community” to thwart the exercise of U.S. military power in foreign affairs. Don’t expect our media to report these facts to the American people U.S. Navy officials, acting clueless and completely in the dark about the nature of U.N. bureaucracies, are actually lobbying on Capitol Hill for Senate ratification of the pact. It shows examples of how weak the U.S. has become that our military officials have been reduced to functioning as a lobbying arm of the Was

2007-07-26 05:59:49 · 6 answers · asked by xyz 2 in Politics & Government Government

*Ducky* you obvioulsy need to turn off your MTV, put down your gameboy and pay attention to the world news and independent media sources, while we still have them. i.e Harry Reids Fairness Doctrine, which was proposed to shut down and silence independent radio for reasons being "threats to national security" There has been a slow grab of power taken away from you for decades now.

2007-07-26 06:25:33 · update #1

*Ducky* you really have the mask of hollywood and corporate media over your eyes. May I ask how old you are?
The men you speak of are in hand with eachother G.H. Bushs' campaign was partly ran on his "New World Order" speeches. You must not be old enough to remember.

2007-07-26 07:32:55 · update #2

6 answers

If you think your voice isn't heard in government now, can you imagine what it would be like with only one world government.

2007-07-26 06:03:07 · answer #1 · answered by osborne_pkg 5 · 1 0

I think you have just touched on the tip of the proverbial iceberg, "pun intended"! I know all that and much more, as for global warming I am all for it, I hate the cold! Actually they should call it something else, it's not getting warmer it's just not getting cold anymore, last winter it rarely dropped below 40 degrees, when I was a kid it got down in the minus numbers frequently!

2007-07-26 13:32:55 · answer #2 · answered by samhillesq 5 · 2 1

Your conclusions are incorrect and paranoid. An excerpt.

The States Parties to this Convention,

Prompted by the desire to settle, in a spirit of mutual understanding and co-operation, all issues relating to the law of the sea and aware of the historic significance of this Convention as an important contribution to the maintenance of peace, justice and progress for all peoples of the world,

Noting that developments since the United Nations Conferences on the Law of the Sea held at Geneva in 1958 and 1960 have accentuated the need for a new and generally acceptable Convention on the law of the sea,

Conscious that the problems of ocean space are closely interrelated and need to be considered as a whole,

Recognizing the desirability of establishing through this Convention, with due regard for the sovereignty of all States, a legal order for the seas and oceans which will facilitate international communication, and will promote the peaceful uses of the seas and oceans, the equitable and efficient utilization of their resources, the conservation of their living resources, and the study, protection and preservation of the marine environment,

Bearing in mind that the achievement of these goals will contribute to the realization of a just and equitable international economic order which takes into account the interests and needs of mankind as a whole and, in particular, the special interests and needs of developing countries, whether coastal or land-locked,

Desiring by this Convention to develop the principles embodied in resolution 2749 (XXV) of 17 December 1970 in which the General Assembly of the United Nations solemnly declared inter alia that the area of the sea-bed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof, beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, as well as its resources, are the common heritage of mankind, the exploration and exploitation of which shall be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole, irrespective of the geographical location of States,

Believing that the codification and progressive development of the law of the sea achieved in this Convention will contribute to the strengthening of peace, security, co-operation and friendly relations among all nations in conformity with the principles of justice and equal rights and will promote the economic and social advancement of all peoples of the world, in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations as set forth in the Charter,

Affirming that matters not regulated by this Convention continue to be governed by the rules and principles of general international law,

Signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, 10 December 1982

2007-07-26 13:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 2 1

I'm not a "alarmist" but you sound like one.

and I think your full of B.S.

"new world order" LOL
------------------------------------------------------------
I don't own a gameboy nor do I watch MTV.

do you have a real source for this "slow grab of power" that's been going on for "decades" ?
if it's been going on for decades why didn't Reagan, Bush, Clinton or bush jr. warn us about this new world order you speak of ? You would think we would have been warned by these men of the dire threat to the United States you speak of.
Or don't those guys care enough about the U.S. and it's freedoms to say something about this serious threat.

2007-07-26 13:04:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Global warming+UN= power grab pure and simple.
Skeptics-for the fate of US sovereignty read the SPP summary at SPP.gov.
That should point you in the direction they are heading.

2007-07-26 13:16:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

One religion? As long as it's atheism, I'm all for it.

I'm tired of morons killing for "god" and having other morons support them for it.

2007-07-26 13:08:25 · answer #6 · answered by It's Kippah, Kippah the dawg 5 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers