English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just a thought :)

According to the 22nd amendment:
"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once"

Does Hillary implicitly qualify for this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

2007-07-26 04:21:14 · 15 answers · asked by xoil1321321432423 4 in Politics & Government Government

Should it apply?

2007-07-26 04:25:03 · update #1

15 answers

She hasnt been elected nor has she held office therefore she is more than legally able to be president.....however for the sake of this country I hope thats not the case. The Clintons are war mongers just like Bush. There are few differences between the two...the all serve the same master (money)

RON PAUL 2008

2007-07-26 04:25:40 · answer #1 · answered by eric54_20 4 · 2 1

The way our constitution has been ignored and twisted to fit presidential desires and no real senate or congressional efforts to stop the abuse it would seem Clinton (or any other self serving president) could also twist the constitution to make it work for them. Americans are too passive and complacent and allow political leaders to get away with too much. The more they get away with the more they do. Who ever becomes the next president will be able to say the precedence was set when Bush did what he wanted so they can do what they want (remember how Clinton said other presidents had affairs in the White House so his should not be looked upon as being bad?). We no longer have a "Checks and Balance” system we have a policy of acceptance allowing select people to bully their way through our government. Senators and congressmen compromise their (and our) interests in order to get their own agendas approved as riders on other bills. We need stronger political representatives, honest ones who are ready to take a stand and fight for all Americans and we need to limit what kind of riders may be attached to a bill.

2007-07-31 04:53:55 · answer #2 · answered by amnestiswrong 5 · 0 0

That amendment refers to the office of the president. Hillary Clinton never occupied the office of the President.

2007-07-26 07:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by vick 3 · 1 0

you spot I certainly have a distinctive opinion of her,Congress has been a majority of republican for an especially long term.So that's amazingly challenging to get a well-being care software exceeded without cooperation from congress. Now inspite of the undeniable fact that the regular public is democrat and in basic terms according to probability which could make a international of distinction in her having the flexibility to do some thing to benift the yankee people. as far because of fact the grain of salt remark it is the 1st i've got heard of it. She are in a place to accomplish a little stable.I additionally am a sparkling Yorker and because she has been senator our u . s . a . has been a multitude,What do you assume her to do? She in all probability has targeted on the thank you to make adjustments if she does exchange into President. yet that's in basic terms my opinion.

2016-10-09 10:05:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No!

Just Nazi Bush implicitly qualify for this?

25th Amendment About To Fall On Bush?
http://cloakanddagger.ca/media/SS/Middle%20Finger%20News/25th%20Amendment%20About%20To%20Fall%20On%20Bush.htm


Cloak and Dagger has been mentioning for some time that the resident of the White House is going bonkers, because the truth of Bush’s treachery is coming out. Now it has become an ‘open secret’. Becoming evident is Bush’s deception and treason of Bush’s prior knowledge of 9-11. And the truth of his disastrous Iraqi War Policy causing great bloodshed for no American purpose.

The 25th Amendment method of removing a President who is dangerously going nuts (like Nixon talking to pictures on White House walls) and cannot carry out his duties of office is becoming a growing public concern.

Unlike Nixon, who resigned, Bush is going down the road like Soviet Dictator Josef Stalin who blamed his “Jewish doctors” as part of a plot to kill him. The doctors were later declared innocent of all charges.

But Bush’s false accusations against “HIS JEWISH DOCTORS” AND HIS JEWISH ADVISORS AND BONDHOUSE BANKERS may soon break out into the open, adding to the anti-Jewish epidemic that is sweeping the country, Nazi-era-like, at a time of vast actual unemployment.

2007-08-02 17:10:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

She gets 8 or more. The 22nd amendment will be over turned.

2007-07-29 14:45:32 · answer #6 · answered by Old Man 7 · 0 0

But Bush signed that executive order basically granting him the presidential privelege to declare emergency and not leave office until such emergency was resolved. he may not use this but isn't it setting a precident for any future presidents?

2007-08-01 17:47:39 · answer #7 · answered by America scarica 3 · 0 0

No, of course not. The amendment was never intended to apply to the spouse of a president.

2007-07-26 04:24:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Cheney can go eight as president and has already served eight in the white house but he has served as V.P. God forbid this scenario but it could happen. This scenario is very bad.

2007-07-26 04:28:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes she can go for another 4 IF nobody wants to take her for the oval office

2007-07-31 06:24:26 · answer #10 · answered by Avin K 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers