Its not till he gets to the last paragraph he even mention Madeleine by name at all.
By that time he told us how great Washington is in the early morn, and how grandiose the British Embassy is.
Lets sharpen the knives people. lol
2007-07-26 02:54:59 · 23 answers · asked by dave s 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
....And it's good to hear he managed to squeeze in his early morning run among the grand buildings and monuments separated by wide grassy areas. Also good to hear the twins are developing good telephone skills - they're going to need them because by the sound of it daddy's not going to be around much these days...
2007-07-26 03:21:41 · answer #1 · answered by georgeygirl 5 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Washington is a big and all know town and is certainly suitable deliver a vacation or perhaps visit this city. with hotelbye you'll learn more. One of the designs of Washington and the entire America is the famous White House, the state residence of the President of the United States. The house of every president except George Washington, it absolutely was actually built by James Hoban in 1792, and after being burned down by British makes in 1814 was renewed in 1818. Though tours of the interior that include the East, Blue, Green, and Red Areas; the Ballroom; and the State Dining Room should be reserved properly in advance, every tourist to Washington would want to see this well-known building, at least from the outside. Next door to the White House are the sophisticated 1833 Greek Revival Treasury Building and the 1871 Executive Office Building, one of the very most striking previous government houses in Washington.
2016-12-23 05:11:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think its time we did a bit of investigative journalism ourselves and at least try and resolve the truth? The truth is in Portugal, I am sure of that. The McCanns can't have it both ways.
Kate McCann's uncle said in the Leicester Mercury (local rag) that the parents cannot defend themselves, and also more importantly they can not discuss the investigation. Gerry McCann has done just that in many ways and more.
The second part is the Portuguese law. I would assume because of the secrecy laws it would be difficult for local people or any such person involved both indirectly or directly to discuss the case more openly. We would need to establish whether that was the case?
I have ready his blog, which was nothing really of interest other than he had viewed the buildings of Washington DC, had meetings with a few politicians etc. See what I can find.
2007-07-26 04:32:33 · answer #3 · answered by puffcandy007 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
That blog is the most verbose piece of nonsense that I have ever had the misfortune to read. As well as being inarticulate, it is boring to the nth degree.
Why Gerry McCann thinks that I would be interested in how many minutes it has taken him to jog up a hill or what he had for breakfast is well beyond me. Doesn't he know that we have out own families, friends and lives and that if we were interested in anyone it would be these people.
I am also getting sick and tired of hearing about veiled threats to sue any forum that speaks out against them. I wish that someone who was actually conversant in law would explain to them that:
a) You need more than £900k to take on an established forum or newspaper, and I'm certain that if they tried to sue Yahoo Answers that people in support of freedom of speech would simply get their own fund together to sue them right back !!!
b) Those people who have donated money to their limited company would love to know where it reads that the object of the "fund" is to use the cash to launch libel suits!
Oh and if people are using proxy servers to post how do they intend to trace them???
2007-07-26 03:41:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Because he has nothing else worth saying. They are no closer to finding Maddie now then they were 3 months ago, are they? Jetting off to the US and Rome has done nothing except make people angry with them. What I would like to see on his blog is "The Police found Maddie today, and we are being investigated for neglect".
2007-07-26 03:00:42 · answer #5 · answered by lululaluau 5 · 10⤊ 3⤋
He wants everyone who contributed to the Fund to know how much he is enjoying their money.
2007-07-26 05:53:42 · answer #6 · answered by MADDY 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The blog has long since stopped being about Madeleine.
2007-07-26 03:02:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 14⤊ 3⤋
i could not give one shi t about Washington, about hes running or his crap blog fro that matter, i care about this child being found safe and well, unlike her parents.
god willing she will be found safe soon, and if this does happen, and in years to come she gets hold of his blog and their antics, she will leave them off her own free will
2007-07-26 03:30:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
well at least he knows where He is
by the way, a blunt knife cut is much worse than one from a sharp one because of the force used -shouldn't we be blunting the knives cutting up newspapers?
2007-07-26 03:35:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Obviously, this guy's blog is more of a tourist journal than
finding a missing child, much less his daughter. Who
cares what he does. It's has nothing to do with a missing
child. Don't waste time reading it. It makes you wonder
what's really going on.
2007-07-26 03:11:56 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 12⤊ 4⤋