Don't worry, this administration is itching to invade Iran.
They are just waiting for another 'pearl harbor' to give them a reason.
They got the first one on 9/11, but everybody already knows that iraq had nothing to do with the WTC attacks.
This next one is going to have to be a little easier to actually tie to Iran (though as we can see with 9/11, not esential).
2007-07-26 02:21:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Its a Bush thing, Its about finishing what his father didn't accomplish and also about leaving a leagacy for him. Yeah I know.. what a legacy, huh? But he is convinced that it will be a good one.
I saw the report on CNN where the president of Iraq or Prime Minister of Iraq or whatever they are called over there, said that Iraq could stand on its own two feet anytime the US pulled out.
But Bush wants to inflict his own sense of democracy and won't go until he gets it.
2007-07-26 09:23:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mrs J 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Invading Iraq was friggin stupid; no WMD's found.
Invading Iran would be even stupide at this point.Sure, theyt are moving toword nukes, but Pakistan has them, so does India and Israel. The genie's out of the bottle
2007-07-26 09:23:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The USA wanted to eliminate the threat of Saddam, and get a better foothold in the middle east.
as far as Iran is concerned, it makes more sense to let the internal strife of hat country bring about a change vs. out and out war.
2007-07-26 09:21:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mark A 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
We went into Iraq because they did not honor the cease fire agreement that was signed after the Gulf War. Had inspectors simply been allowed to do their job properly this could have all been avoided.
2007-07-26 09:22:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brian 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The world was telling us Iraq had WMD's too. They did find WMD's, hundreds of them. My brother in law saw them with his own two eyes: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
Are you suggesting that Iran is our ally or something?
2007-07-26 09:23:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because OPEC might then embargo us, leading to $5 or $6 per gallon, as well as Russia would not tolerate us doing that to Iran.
2007-07-26 09:21:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because we decided that a proxy war with Iraq would be a better deal. Didn't you get the memo?
2007-07-26 09:20:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by CHARITY G 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Good question i think thy know that Iran will attack Israel
2007-07-26 09:21:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulcondo 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
tell u what
2007-07-26 09:21:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋