If so, who should be the running pres and who should be the running mate?
2007-07-24 17:06:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yeah, provided they are running a marathon, but Hillary might slow Obama down (she ain't in the best of shape.
Presidential speaking, you have got to be joking. Obama doesn't even acknowledge that his true race.
They are both losers and will probably remain so.
2007-07-24 17:21:59 · answer #1 · answered by shewolf3808 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If Clinton wins the nomination, she will ask Obama to be her running mate. If Obama is smart, he will turn her down, because she will never let him be a leader. He would do better to stay in the Senate and work his way up from there.
If Obama wins the nomination, there is no way in heck he would ask Clinton to be the VP. The last thing he would want is a lightning-rod running mate with an ex-President in her pocket. He's more likely to pick Edwards or Bill Richardson, or some Senator who is not even in the race.
I don't think you will see a Clinton/Obama ticket, either direction.
2007-07-25 00:42:42 · answer #2 · answered by Chredon 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that neither is going to be chosen as the Democratic presidential candidate. Hilary flip-flops a lot while Obama is all inspiration but no substance. Besides I don't think this country is ready for a female or black president.
2007-07-25 00:13:43 · answer #3 · answered by Don S 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't vote for them due to my opposition to abortion and capital punishment (Hillary supports both), but they would make a good team and make history. It would be nice to get some old attitudes about race and gender behind us a bit more than those attitudes are now.
I'd be more likely to vote for someone who agrees more with the positions found in the following links:
http://www.voteforjoe.com
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
http://www.consistent-life.org
http://www.democratsforlife.org
http://www.plagal.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AlternativeLifers
http://www.yaktivist.com -- A place to discuss developing nonlethal weapons and nonlethal pregnancy termination technology.
2007-07-25 00:13:53 · answer #4 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
shouldnt they both qualify first. obama has zero experience at anything international. hillary, hmm. i guess if you think laura bush is qualified to be president, hillary is qualified. otherwise i don't get why she is even running. what has she accomplished in her political "career"lol. this is the lady that said saddam had weapons of mass destruction and all the crap bush fed us. she said all of it. said american is under imminent danger. now listen to her. we need someone who can see the problems before we get into them. anybody can see it was a mistake later on. this is why ron paul is the only man that is qualified in my opinion.
2007-07-25 00:15:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I like both, although I think that Obama (why do we call her by her first name and him by his last name?) doesn't have enough foreign policy experience for this point in history to be president (if the country weren't in such a mess with the rest of the world, I would agree that he has as much experience as many other presidents we've had, but I really think right now we need someone with significant experience in that area). However, I've heard that they don't like one another, and I do think that we need a team who can work well together.
2007-07-25 00:25:13 · answer #6 · answered by neniaf 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Hillary represents the past..Obama should choose a real American like Colin Powell as his running mate..So he can unite the two parties..
2007-07-25 00:11:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Obama and Ron Paul..
2007-07-25 00:13:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i don't think either are qualified. But if it happened hillery would be in the top spot and Obama VP.
2007-07-25 00:09:14 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They give me the runs.
2007-07-25 00:12:29 · answer #10 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋