And if so what did you think of it? I missed it.
2007-07-24 16:46:54 · 14 answers · asked by Tom S 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It was kind of cheesy.. And the questions really weren't anything new.. I do think Anderson did a good job making sure the candidates actually answered the questions at hand, he wasn't letting them dodge like usual.. Hopefully the same will happen in the Reps upcoming debate..
2007-07-24 16:52:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It was definitely a little different from your normal debate, with the questions coming from people other than journalists.
The host of the dabate also did a nice job keeping the candidates on topic and not letting them ramble on beyond their allotted time.
it's in four parts at cnn.com heres the link to the first part
sorry last link was no good heres the right one.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2007/07/23/youtube.debate.pt1.cnn
2007-07-25 00:02:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What the candidates said they are going to do are not necessarily what they will do or can do. They debated the same rhetoric said during past elections. They accommodated and pleased all the people who supplied the question because that's what these people wanted to hear.
2007-07-25 00:09:06 · answer #3 · answered by Don S 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, iam a liberal DEM, but the answers were the usual B>S>..nothing new
2007-08-01 12:20:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was stupid. I'd un-watch it if I could. Talking snowmen...idiotic. Also, every "serious" question that was addressed had already been asked and answered by the candidates a hundred million times before.
2007-07-24 23:54:21 · answer #5 · answered by The Doctor 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You did not miss much...boring...it was aimed at the lowest common denominator...Hillary I don't think much of your coat...these clowns want to be president...the other side is not much better...oh brother...it's going to be another long 4 years...Vote Green 2008 Goof
2007-07-24 23:51:05 · answer #6 · answered by loofa36 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, the questions were good, the questionares bad and oh the candidates well yes, um, they dodged just about every single serious question there was about themselves and where they stand and instead turned it into a laughfest.
2007-07-24 23:49:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
It was pathetic. 80% of the questions were liberal questions, 10% were stupid questions, and 10% were conservative questions. Most of the answers were terrible too.
2007-07-25 00:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by qwert 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pretty good, better than Republican debates which are usually a proclamation of their gay love for Reagan and a competition of who wins that's claim.
2007-07-25 00:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by Dangerous 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes.
Makes me very glad I am a Republican.
2007-08-01 16:42:22 · answer #10 · answered by Fritz Milan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋