English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

27 answers

No, it's her body, not his. They should both make decisions together.

2007-07-24 16:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Absolutely not! In your world, women do all the work when it comes to having children. So, of course a man would probably want half a dozen kids or more because he wouldn't be doing any of the work.

In my world, children should be something mutually agreed upon by husband and wife. If they want only one or two kids, then it's birth control, tubal ligation or vasectomy after the second, whatever is decided mutually by the couple. If one person wants a child and the other doesn't, no child should be conceived.

2007-07-25 10:08:06 · answer #2 · answered by Erin 7 · 2 0

No. Because his 'desires' may be without thought, meaning they may not be ready for even one child when and if the husband wants it. And it isn't his body, he doesn't go through the nine months of pregnancy, or the labor. I say if she doesn't want that kind of pain and suffering, he should respect that and love her enough not to let her go through something like that again if she doesn't want to. And the couple might just have a hard enough time taking care of one child, it would stupid to want another. Especially seeing as the female/wife/mother is the one to take care of and raise the child, the male/husband/farther STILL isn't the one going through it all. So again the female has all the say in this. I mean unless you put yourself in her shoes, I don't think anyone has the right to say other wise

2007-07-26 22:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I do.

Usually husband and wife agree on the number of kids. If one or the other wants more, it's usually a compromise anyway...

:) I think this question is a good one, and it can be interpreted in many different ways.

I also think that the husband should want to have as many kids as the wife wants...

2007-07-24 23:51:53 · answer #4 · answered by SweetElf 4 · 2 1

Interesting question.

I think that this is a joint question - and that couples shouldn't have more children than they can afford to raise. (Of course, no one can predict the future, but if you already have 3 kids and have trouble feeding them, having more seems irresponsible.)

As someone else pointed out, if you believe this, then should a man have as many children as the wife wants if she wants more than he does? (If you say yes to one question and no to the other, then I think you are unfair.)

2007-07-25 12:53:26 · answer #5 · answered by tigglys 6 · 1 0

Well come now, how much children do you think the husband is going to ask for anyway?

2007-07-25 00:07:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, they both make desicions together, not one demanding the other. Also, just because the man wants more, doesn't mean the woman has to have it, because it's her body and men don't understand how much the woman go through.

2007-07-24 23:52:33 · answer #7 · answered by Cecilia ♡ 6 · 2 0

if he desires for her to bear as many as she wants then yes

2007-07-25 14:23:48 · answer #8 · answered by Liquid♥Onyx 4 · 0 0

No, it takes two to make a child, and, after all, she's the one who has to actually bear the child in the first place.

2007-07-24 23:44:34 · answer #9 · answered by eprice08 2 · 7 0

No and if he has a problem with that....we now have the unique ability to let a man carry a child in his own belly. If he wants a lot of kids, he can go for it.

2007-07-24 23:44:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Of course she should bear as many children as she can for her husband, Sand.

Then she should run off with the Cable guy and leave every dammmm one of them with him....

2007-07-24 23:49:56 · answer #11 · answered by Moma 7 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers