When I was young men were in charge of everything. They really didn't listen to their women at all, which was a mistake. Things began to change in the 60s, some for the better and some for the worse. Women got paid equally in the job force, which was a good thing. Unfortunately though, women eventually began to take charge of everything, not so good. Women are so much better at relationships than I am ( another good thing) but not so good at thinking without the influence of the emotions. Men are much better at that. We pretty much balance each other out in a healthy relationship.
What America needs now are men who will stand up and be men. Thinking without the dominance of emotion.
Are you the man? Or will you just say "Yes Dear."
2007-07-24 16:15:14 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To a degree, I agree.
2007-07-24 16:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by Glen B 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Grandpa? Is that you??
Seriously though, please consider the hypothetical scenario of a nuclear launch:
Emotions, and associated irrational behavior, are NOT specific to the female gender. Very strict procedures, including two-person code verification sequences, are in place (for good reason!) to deal with emotions in this type of scenario. These procedures have been in place long before a woman's finger was ever near those buttons.
In this scenario, would you rather have a president that:
1. promotes and encourages diversity of opinion from their staff to ensure that someone will give them a 'reality check' if they are being irrational
- OR -
2. surrounds themselves with "like minded" people because they are intolerant of opposing viewpoints. Even if it means culling 150 members of their staff from a tier 4 (lowest rung) institution of "higher learning".
You decide! I'm not a Hillary fan by a long shot, but not because she's a woman. I do know that Bush's way of thinking, influenced by ego and intolerant of dissenting opinions, is a very real danger! If you can't see the rationale in this scenario, then YOU need to quit thinking with YOUR emotions!
2007-07-24 16:59:59 · answer #2 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, sorry, but you'll find no love here. This is the generation where we can't say mean things about women.
2007-07-24 16:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by null 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have had several questions in this vein....
Is someone feeling "hen-pecked"?
What are you looking for, a strong domestic partner? What exactly do you think is missing? We are doing just fine, thanks.
g-day!
2007-07-24 16:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by Kekionga 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure I understood your point. Do you want us to go against Hillary because she's a woman? I will not vote for her, but not because she's a woman, but because she would make a bad leader.
Again, I'm not too sure what you meant.
2007-07-24 16:20:42 · answer #5 · answered by justin b 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Get a blog and run your mouth there instead of posting all of your shite on Answers.
2007-07-24 16:25:40 · answer #6 · answered by wyllow 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
She holds the punanny, so she holds the cards... My hand gets tired after a while.
2007-07-24 16:19:41 · answer #7 · answered by CAUTION:Truth may hurt! 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Get a grip, man!!
What's with you, to night?!! and manhood?!!
I have totally lost you! what would you like us to say??!!
Bush is good/bad OR Hillary?!
MAKE UP YOUR MIND, MAAAAN!
2007-07-24 16:25:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh now just hush up and have another beer.
2007-07-24 16:20:17 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Do you have a problem with women?
When mine says "Get into bed", I say... Yes Dear.
2007-07-24 16:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋