which canidate do YOU want for president?
2007-07-24 11:54:32 · 18 answers · asked by Kiana 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I haven't made up my mind yet, It is a little early in the proceedings. The primaries haven't started yet and the debates are of little help since there are so many candidates. Dennis Kucinich is interesting but not electable. Edwards, Obama and Clinton haven't inspired me and I don't know who the Green party nominee is yet. You guessed it, I am a tree hugger.
2007-07-24 12:12:01 · answer #1 · answered by Follow the money 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not anti-democrat, I'm just anti-socialist and both Obama and Hillary are BIG TIME socialists. I live in fear that either of them would be elected. As deep in debt as our country was made by the current president and the old Republican congress, they would blow the budget way out of the water AND raise taxes. That's a fact. Of the remaining democrats, I'm not terribly impressed. And yet, on the other hand, I'm not terribly impressed with any of the Republicans who are running. I want someone fiscally conservative and strong on national defense. That doesn't describe any of the democrats or many of the Republicans at the moment. Possibly Guliani, he comes closest.
2007-07-24 19:04:31 · answer #2 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fred Thompson
2007-07-24 19:03:09 · answer #3 · answered by Sheila E 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fred Thompson or Mitt Romney
2007-07-24 19:27:36 · answer #4 · answered by Kar 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
President Obama
2007-07-24 18:58:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Madam President Hillary Clinton! I like the sound of that and on top of that the first woman prezzy and wife of a formor president! That's like two halves of a whole.
2007-07-24 19:07:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama or Hilary, depending on how the war in Iraq goes.
If it's clear that we need to leave, then Obama.
If it's clear that we need to stay, then Hilary.
Not to say that domestic issues aren't important (I think Obama is actually stronger on those, because Hilary totally botched healthcare while she was governor of NY,) but war tends to upstage those things.
2007-07-24 19:01:50 · answer #7 · answered by Lynn M 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hilary is the safest bet. Obama and Edwards may both have more potential, but Hilary will instantly restore our prestige and set the country on a positive path in all aspects.
But Al Gore, actually.
2007-07-24 19:20:25 · answer #8 · answered by doblechivo 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
In a perfect world, Dennis Kucinich. It's never going to happen, but hey! We can wish, right?
As long as it's a Democrat (or Ron Paul I guess) I'll be satisfied just to give Texas back their idiot.
2007-07-24 19:08:18 · answer #9 · answered by Kate J 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Id be happy with Obama or Romeny...They really shoud run on a ticket together and put partisan politics aside.
2007-07-24 19:59:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋