Problem with your 9/11 conspiracy?

Question

Watch this movie and let me explain why there were no explosives
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cd6ibu8dafw...

1. The puffs of smoke they target in the beginning: While the buildings are still up they are filled with air and smoke right? well when they collapse where does that air go? it finds the most convirnient path out. the small targets zoom in to only some of the puffs cuz the resolution isn't good enough, so you can't see all the others.

2. True, they were built in three sections, but they weren't solid concrete and steel, there was a lot of rooms for matinence like heating, cooling, water, etc. Even if it was solid concrete, the mass and speed [momentum] would be way to much for those to withstand. There is no way it would just stop it and send it down to the street.

3. The firemen say they saw a lot of puffs of smoke as they fell down, this proves my first point they there were a lot as the buildings fell, but the movie makes it seem like there were only a few.

4. WTC7 looks nothing like the towers. The center of it comes down before the sides. On the towers, the whole thing comes down and even tilta a little. And notice no little puffs of smoke. But that's because it fell from the base of the building.

True no building has collapsed from fire, but there has never been a builing full of burning jet fuel with that many stories above it. And FYI anything that would destroy the center supports of a building wether it's acid, fire, explosives or whatever, would make it look like a controlled explosion

Smore isn't charachteristic for controlled explosions because they fall from the bottem, not the top. Because it's falling from the top the air goes down. Where's the air going to go of its falling from the bottom? It's going to go down.

Answer 1

Thanks Jack....it is beyond me why people actually believe in conspiracy theories.

Answer 2

.Notice how black the smoke was in those fires, that is carbon, a product of incomplete combustion the result of an oxygen starved fire, also a fire that is not that hot 800f max. Most of the fuel from the jets exploded outside of the building.Firefighter radio transcripts say they could have knocked those fires down with a couple 2 1/34 hand lines. Also simple physics, conservation of mass, those buildings fell with no resistance from the lower floors in about 10 seconds, impossible unless the lower support columns were cut. Molten steel found in all 3 buildings 5 weeks after collapse, traces of thermite also found. Official govt version is the real conspiracy.

Answer 3

why did george bush's brother ( he was in charge of company that provided wtc security ) do those strange building sweeps 2 weeks before 9/11 , where everyone had to leave during these inspections ? why , when his company's contract to provide security expired on 9/11/01 did he not bother to renew it before 9/11 ? did he know there wouldn't be a building after 9/11 ? wtc#7 , the conventionally built 48 story building , had the new york offices of the FBI , CIA , and the n.y.c. office of emergency management with its special disaster control room . #7 was not hit directly by the jets or fuel , though there were reports of sporadic fires throughout the day in the building . it sure looked like a controlled demolition to me when it was 'pulled' . remember the reichstag fire ?

Answer 4

the towers were not filled with smoke, the fire fighters' radio tapes shows that the fires were almost out, and that they were contained to only a couple of floors. and for the smoke to thrust out of the windows like that is not characteristic of a collapsing building. It is characteristic of a building being demolished with explosives.

Whoever doesn't even look into these alternatives to the government's conspiracy theory is, in my opinion, a retard (kylekuypers).

Your arguments hold no water. They actually only give more attention to the conspiracy theories.

It just doesn't add up. Something is wrong with the way they fell, the shady circumstances, Bush and Cheney's unwillingness to allow a full investigation, and the explanation of how they fell. The 9/11 commission hardly mentioned building 7 in their report, exceot to admit that the chances of it happening were very slim. It all stinks. All evidence points to demolition, and this would imply government involvement. But we will never know for sure, until a president allows an unobstructed investigation. The administration continues to destroy evidence, and so the chances of this happening are shrinking. We MUST investigate the possibility that some faction of the government was involved in the murder of over 3000 innocent people. We owe that to the victim's families, do we not?

It is very foolish to believe your government, especially when they have such a long track record of lying.

Answer 5

THE BBC REPORTED THAT WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING 7 HAD COLLAPSED. THE ONLY PROBLEM WAS THAT THE BUILDING WAS IN THE BACKGROUND SHOT OF THE REPORTER WHILE SHE WAS REPORTING...

FACT: FIRE CANNOT MELT STEEL.

FACT: MOLTEN STEEL AND BENT STEEL WAS FOUND WITH NO STRESS CRACKS.

FACT: THE BUILDINGS FELL FASTER THAN FREE FALL SPEED

LAST BUT NOT LEAST... I OWN A COPY OF THE DOCUMENT: REBUILDING AMERICAS DEFENSES. WRITTEN BY PAUL WOLFOWITZ, DICK CHENEY, DONALD RUMSFELD AND OTHERES. IN THE REPORT IT TALKS ABOUT HAVING AN ATTACK ON AMERICAN SOIL PUT IN PLACE. THE KICK IS THAT THIS REPORT WAS WRITTEN IN 1998. EVERYTHING IN THE REPORT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW.

WAKE UP!


okay... between right now and the end of the year we are going to be attacked. when we are i wont say i told you.

no. im not a physisist . i didnt realize that you had to be in oreder to have knowledge. hmm. i'll remember that.

Answer 6

Here's another kick in the a** for conspiracy theorists. Great article explaining the collapse written by a fire chief. Conspiracy theorists are nuts.

http://www.lafire.com/famous_fires/2001-0911_WTC/2002-0500_LA-Firefighter_WTC-BuildingCollapse_Dunn.htm

Answer 7

Youtube is NOT a credible source of information--it is the equivalent of the Weekly World News.

You aren't supposed to actually believe conspiracy theories. They are for entertainment purposes only.

Answer 8

Also, Elvis is alive and there were no moon landings. Everything was filmed in Arizona. I can tell you some stuff about Roswell, NM, too. I learned everything while standing in line at the supermarket. It's all documented, right there at the checkstand.

Answer 9

The best way to deal with conspiracy nuts is to ignore them.

Proverbs 26:4 "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him."

Answer 10

the url does not work I wanted to watch your video have you seen LooseCange 2nd edition?

Answer 11

boy ur giving a lot facts. i hope ur some kind of physisist or something. and not just some bored boy.