It doesn't seem like any of the current candidates can draw the sword from the stone. Do you think Arthur will ever emerge from the din?
2007-07-24 10:29:32 · 7 answers · asked by Overt Operative 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If we are looking for the Champions of the Holy Grail from the current crop we are surely lost. I haven't watched any of the debates yet and really I am not paying close attention to the Presidential race in general. This will change some once we near the Primaries and my interest level will grow exponentially when the candidates are set. Campaigning has begun way too early and we run the risk of voter burnout before any of it really becomes meaningful in any real sense.
2007-07-24 14:08:13 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They don't even need to pick up a stick in front of the stone as the US is ready for anybody but a dumb repube in 08. Besides you guys got flashback mcain and sleeping cousins gooliani. Oh yeah and Fred "what's my name" Thompson. Yeeeeehaaaaaw.
2007-07-24 10:37:06 · answer #2 · answered by bbbbriggs04 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the point.
The two year campaign is designed to keep out candidates who aren't 100% committed to doing whatever it takes to become President.
It's also designed to fatigue the voters so that only the hacks still have the enthusiasm to vote.
2007-07-24 10:32:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Arthur has emerged, corporate media won't mention him. His name is Ron Paul.
Your question denotes concern. If your concern is real, please learn about Dr. Paul, support him and vote for him.
2007-07-24 10:37:12 · answer #4 · answered by Dick W 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The race is already over....it's going to be Mitt Romney.
2007-07-24 10:32:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You only wish that were true!
2007-07-24 10:32:40 · answer #6 · answered by jdoh10 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, yes.
2007-07-24 10:35:40 · answer #7 · answered by Barry W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋