2007-07-24 09:51:37 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Is he pandering to his NAMBLA constituents?
2007-07-24 09:53:58 · update #1
trovolta=NAMBLA apologist
2007-07-24 09:55:51 · update #2
You know he will have the 5yr olds reading.."I have Two Daddys".
2007-07-24 09:57:13 · update #3
Will he be handing out colored condoms..
2007-07-24 09:58:34 · update #4
Is this what they taught him in his Indonesian madrasa?
2007-07-24 09:59:31 · update #5
To start programming them in the direction the Libs want.
Remove the "Christian" God from school and teach 5 year olds how to put on a condom. You can be expelled for drawing a picture of a soldier with a gun but can wear a shirt showing Marlyn Manson covered in blood. They removed drivers ed and replaced it with a class on health and alternate lifestyles. History books show the kind, noble Islamic student next to a picture of a smelly, dirty, Christian crusader.
It's never to young to start, they took a page from the tobacco advertisers handbook it appears.....
2007-07-24 10:09:30 · answer #1 · answered by The Forgotten 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
All they would be taught is if anyone touches them in an inappropriate area that it is bad and they should tell a trusted adult. I mean I could see the argument leave it to the parents to tell them that but some parents are extremely stupid and never tell their kids these things or they could even be abusing their own child. Children need to know that it is not okay for anyone to touch them in those places and they need to tell someone if that happened to them. Why is that so wrong?
2007-07-24 16:58:58 · answer #2 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's doing that so those 5 years olds won't end up being 12 year old mothers. Kids need to know.
2007-07-24 17:21:12 · answer #3 · answered by wrjones559_1999 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you would have listened to what he said you would know that he is not trying to get sex ed taught to 5 year olds, he said he would want them to know what inappropriate touching was so they could be safer from predators.
2007-07-25 01:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by tnlstn 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two things on that whole topic:
1. It brings up more curiosity to children on sex.
2. It is supposed to have children learn about molestation and child abuse and to teach them to not be afaid to come forward and report it.
Husband of a teacher (a Conservative Republican teacher at that.)
2007-07-24 17:05:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is not sex education as most think of sex ed. What he believes in is age appropriate sex education. He believes that it is smart to start teaching kids as young as 5 about things such as appropriate and inappropriate touch. In today's world with sick people praying an babies I think it is smart to arm them with all the tools we can to protect them selves and what better tool than knowledge?
2007-07-24 16:56:37 · answer #6 · answered by Mariah B 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
That's the age where they get curious and have lot's of sexual questions for their parents. I think it's a great idea. The earlier they learn, the smarter they will be when it comes time for them to make decisions.
2007-07-24 16:54:46 · answer #7 · answered by svictor24 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
As a way to prevent children from being the victims of pedophiles and other sexual criminals. If you give children the knowledge and the vocabulary to arm themselves they are less likely to be in a bad situation or report it if they do get molested.
2007-07-24 16:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Funny haha. Let's see. What twisted statement can I say about Republicans? Oh, here's one! Why do Republicans like to molest little boys?
2007-07-24 16:56:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He is a sad, sad, sorry little man. I was dumbfounded when I read his comments. His handlers are trying to put a different spin on it but he said what he said. This guy is an idiot. He is dangerous too due to his lack of experience and naivete.
2007-07-24 16:56:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋