Yes, it is. Originally a "Phonograph Record" shortened to simply "Record."
2007-07-24 09:36:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chewie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I remember those. They used to be called LPs (standing for Long Playing Records). 33 1/3 rpm for these, 45 rpm for 7" or 12" singles, not half a cazillion RPM like these new fangled CDs. . They weighed a lot more than CDs though. Anyone interested in an 'analogue sounds better than digital' discussion?
2007-07-24 23:56:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mathemaniac 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i have a hole in middle of a 14 ins flat black disc this is a record jimmey wide used to play it
2007-07-27 04:23:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by ken p 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either that or a dinner plate with a hole in it. Try spinning it on a phonograph and setting a needle down on it. If you get a sound other than plain old scratching, it may be a record.
2007-07-24 09:24:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by fangtaiyang 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
dadgum young whippersnappers! Look for the Victorola to play your classic record!
2007-07-24 09:25:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ask me anything 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I've got one that's only 7 inches!
2007-07-24 09:49:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is, but if it's one of the flexible ones, I believe the terminology now is a 'vinyl'.
2007-07-24 09:39:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is so old, it's grown a long white beard.
2007-07-24 20:22:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mike 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no its not. i have at least 30 of them
2007-07-24 09:46:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
could be unless you have just ironed the cat.
2007-07-25 02:01:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by HaSiCiT Bust A Tie A1 TieBusters 7
·
0⤊
0⤋