oh yes! i love him very much for who he is,and i appreciate what WE have and don't worry about what we don't have(as in materialistic things).we have what we can afford and that is enough for us both!i appreciate what he/we have and i appreciate who he is.he is the love of my life!
2007-07-24 09:23:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by fishin for answer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I appreciate him for what he is not what he has. when I first met him I was more concerned about him having a job. I didn't care what his income was, just that he had a job. Thank god he did or I would have missed out on one of the most amazing men I've ever met in my whole entire life.
2007-07-24 16:21:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by jacquie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely - we started out with nothing at the age of 21 and built ourselves a nice little empire being able to retire last year at the age of 40. Not a bad run.
2007-07-24 16:19:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, I'm having a problem appreciating anything about him right now.
2007-07-24 16:21:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Luvatlanta 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love and appreciate him for who he is and all that he does for me and for how much he cares for me. It probably wouldn't have lasted if I wanted him for what he has. That's a bad basis for a relationship.
2007-07-24 16:20:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Paula 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely for what he is. As Whitney Houston (God bless her soul) used to sing, "he's all the man i'll ever need".
2007-07-24 17:43:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love my wife for who she is.
It's very comforting to know that she loves me unconditionally'.
After two failed marriages I finally got my soul mate.
The other two were in it for what they could get out of it.
2007-07-24 16:22:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dragonskeeper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I did after I divorced him!
2007-07-24 16:19:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by marsh 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What he has I could care less about who he is sometimes.
2007-07-24 16:19:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by coan2007 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I did not appreciate him for what he was. But it was mutual that is why WAS
2007-07-24 16:19:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tammi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋