Although I'm uncircumcised (I answered your other question) I just wanted to share a link to a survey that asked what your two questions asked. It's at Jackinworld (the male masturbation website). It's question 17 in this survey:
http://www.jackinworld.com/library/surveys/survey5.html
Basically, it showed the uncircumcised group slight more satisfied (by a percentage point or two). What does this mean? It's pretty equal (within margin of error). The only difference is that those unsatisfied uncircumcised guys can simply go get cut and be satisfied in the end.
And another survey of interest:
http://www.jackinworld.com/qow/q15.html
I hope those links help. Good luck with your child!
2007-07-24 12:10:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jorge 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Yes, I am very glad I was circumcised for many reasons.
1. My penis looks nice
2. My wife and previous partners all prefer it.
3. No premature ejaculation problems, too sensitive can be a problem ya know.
4. I never once in my entire life had a hygiene or infection problem related to my penis. Friends and relatives who were uncut all had problems from time to time. Just that fact alone is enough reason in my book.
5. I have a much lower chance of catching AIDS...enough said on that fact.
6. I just don't buy all the anti-circumcision BS being pushed on us these days. I don't know anyone who wishes they had their foreskin back. I do know guys who wish they had been circumcised though and are planning to have it done as an adult. They all wish they had it done as a child like I did. I have no memories of the procedure. I don't miss my foreskin. I don't feel like less of a man, in fact I feel like more of a man. I didn't have any complications and neither did anyone I have talked to about it. It is not genital mutilation like female circumcision is, no matter how many times the anti-circumcision people say it is. Just because you repeat something a million times doesn't make it fact.
7. If I had not been circumcised as an infant I WOULD have had it done as an adult.
8. When I was in Jr High, uncircumcised boys were humiliated daily in the showers...I felt bad for them.
9. If I have a male child, I will have him circumcised.
2007-07-24 17:48:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by FunkyChicken2000 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
No because I'd like to have the extra skin and the natural look seems to be all the rage in the adult entertainment area. Probably because they'll a bit unusual in the U.S. Because I was circumcised at birth and it's all I've known, I think it might be fun to be uncircumcised. Uncircumcised penises are often said to be more sensitive. Adults always have the option of doing it later on in life. That's something to consider.
2007-07-24 16:38:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ericbryce2 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
I am (very happily) not circumcised, but there is a man who posts now and then on this forum, cut50yearsago, who has very eloquently described his experience with the procedure. Take a look at his "Best Answer" at http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ara0JtreeCtXqNGthDfDqGXty6IX?qid=20070326091356AAwBuUb&show=7#profile-info-8I5E0rLoaa or any of his other answers. Do you want your son to feel that way when he is older?
2007-07-24 16:24:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Maple 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Uncut men get pleasure from the foreskin rubbing back and forth over the head of the penis. In cut men they get pleasure from rubbing the penis in and out vigorously. In cut men the head of the penis has more definition and thickens due to being exposed, also keratin (spelling) builds up dramatically in the head of the penis, meaning its harder for infections to go in, as well as this in uncut men the head can get hot and sweaty inside the foreskin which is perfect for bacteria.
In the penis there are 2 nerves that branch out all over the penis, it is said that they are most sensitive in the head of the penis and when the foreskin is cut the head thickens reducing the sensitivity of the penis, however due to the fact that cut men get pleasure from rubbing the penis vigorously it may counteract this. Another thing is due to the different methods of getting pleasure in men, when having sex the women gets more pleasure because instead of uncut men having their skin pretty much in the same position in and the penis gliding in and out of that, cut men thrust in and out of the women, with a more defined head.
In my opinion its a matter of choice, some men will be better cut, others uncut. I was cut as a child however i would have liked it if i could have foreskin for part of my life to see how it was like, but then again if i was never cut i prob wouldn't get it done as an adult.
2007-07-24 17:08:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by ertyu 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Doesn't matter if I am glad about it, or not.
It's gone.
It's long gone. Oh well.
I can't miss what I never had to begin with.
At least I can console myself deep inside that my chances of AIDS and penile cancer are like 64% less, comforting news knowing that I'm a VIRGIN who's not sleeping around anyway.
But hey, at least I look like my dad when I'm naked.
That's good isn't it? I've never even seen my dad naked.
2007-07-24 16:03:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
no im not really glad that i was circumcised, but then again my fiancee said shes had circumsised and uncircumcised and she likes mine above all so thats all that im worried about.
2007-07-24 16:02:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was circumcised as a infant and regret it, the decision should be left up to the child when he is old enough to make that decision. With our modern world and daily bathing, hygiene is not a problem, just teach him to pull back the skin and wash with soap and water.
2007-07-24 16:34:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jason 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I am glad that I was circumcised. I can't imagine having a large foreskin like that. Plus the health and hygiene benefits are there.
2007-07-24 16:10:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I am so very, very glad that I was not circumcised. My two sons were not circumcised either.
About 90% of my sexucal sensation takes place in the foreskin. Without it, sex would be purely mechanical.
2007-07-24 16:08:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rick P 1
·
2⤊
2⤋