I would not say that George W. Bush is the best president we've ever had, but he certainly is not the worst. Dick Cheney would not be my pick for the next president, but the world would not end if he had to takeover the job. If we had 150,000 more troops available and a good plan to crush Al-Qaeda in Iraq I would be all for that plan. unfortunately we just don't have the manpower to support a build up that large. George W. Bush is not the super-villain that people try to make him out to be. He really believed he was going to help Iraq, but he botched the post invasion phase and let a strong insurgency take root because he was afraid to take on the task of nation building. Mistakes have been made in every war. This was a big one. They tried to build a democracy from the top down rather than from the bottom up. It just won't work that way. Going back and doing it right now is going to take a lot longer. It was an error in judgment, but not an evil act. Bush has done some good things. He salvaged the economy after 9/11. He lowered taxes. And he stood strong in the face of the greatest threat our nation has seen. Not the best president, but an adequate president in a very trying time.
2007-07-24 08:11:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by James L 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush spent way too plenty money. every person can agree on that. yet Obama has already spent extra in 2 a million/2 years than Bush did in 8. So, while in comparison with our cutting-edge chief, George Bush unquestionably appears like a miser. Wow, that's certainly pathetic that this way of great style of folk spoke back this question without certainly reading a unmarried element after the main line (or are completely blind to sarcasm). And to be sparkling, in case you spoke back "that's a shaggy dog tale, suitable?" or some thing comparable, i'm speaking approximately you.
2016-10-09 08:27:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say that almost every response you've had so far is a snipey little jab at the prisident and maybe one of them has actually consided the concept fully. Bush is not the best...... but there have been worse. There are skills he needed and just doesn't have. Oh well.
Cheney could do the job but has extremely shakey health and a supremacy complex. I would not elect him but not would I run for the shelter if Bush's colonoscopy went graphically wrong.
2007-07-25 01:30:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by joshbl74 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would say you were 3 bricks shy of a load.
Not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
4 fries short of a happy meal.
Shall I go on?
2007-07-24 08:11:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by mikey 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Thank god this is a democracy. (sort of anyway)
I'd tell you to castrate yourself so not to infect the gene pool.
Let's escalate a war we can't win!!! More dead American G.I.'s, more anti US aggression.
Wow dip ****.
Here's a tip from your old buddy, go back to school, soon, because like our President you are a functional retard.
2007-07-24 08:07:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by mskellick 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
IF you said that to me, I'd say....
"Dan. You know we go way back. But I have one question for you."
(you say) "What's that, L-Boogie?"
"What do 5 fingers say to a face?"
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
lol. Yes, I would. Just like on TV when someone needs to be brought to their senses, I'd give you a swift open-handed slap. (Charlie Murphy and Rick James style, of course!)
2007-07-24 08:04:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by YSIC 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would suggest you dial 911 for a quick trip to your local nuthouse.
2007-07-24 07:47:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
You can go ahead and tell me. I'll laugh anyway.
2007-07-24 07:55:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by douglas l 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would say that I'm ashamed to share my name with you.
2007-07-24 07:47:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by dan 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Most of us would probably point and laugh at you.
2007-07-24 07:54:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by gone 7
·
3⤊
0⤋