This would probably help both franchises that need talent but I'll let u ppl judge.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2167~1727~261&teams=16~16~21
Or this one?
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=49~510~261&teams=16~16~21
2007-07-24 07:22:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
The 1st one.
But I think this is probably the better trade:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2166~660~1727~261&teams=16~16~16~21
2007-07-24 07:26:56 · answer #1 · answered by Low Contributor 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i doubt either one of the two would happen. the suns arent giving up amare in any garnett deal. the second one i dont think the timberwolves are interested in. the suns would do it in a heartbeat i believe, but marion has already expressed publicly that he would have no intention of re-signing with minnesota when his contract expired, basically killing that option. the best of the garnett offers have come and gone. the celtics were the wolves' best offer, giving up the 5th pick from this draft, al jefferson, and i think an expiring contract and maybe delonte west. the best they can get now from boston is a couple picks, al jefferson, and theo ratliffs expring contract. garnett, in my opinion will remain in minnesota at least till the feb trade deadline.
2007-07-28 14:14:08 · answer #2 · answered by the great 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt do either, KG want make that big of a difference to the Suns. They go as far as their d will let them if they cant get stops it doesnt matter. KG needs to go to an east team where he could help them win 10+ more games a season like Cleveland, or Chicago, or the wizards.
2007-07-24 14:46:09 · answer #3 · answered by JW 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1st one- no way suns wouldnt give up a young talent like amera and there shoutdown guy for an aging veteran
2nd one- more plausible shawn marion wants to be a star and garnett fits perfect but wouldnt contribute as much as the years go by
2007-07-24 16:40:11 · answer #4 · answered by elnino_baller 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that trade would be marion and banks for garnett. That way when marion leaves they get cap relief and and then they get a good your point guard. The marion bell trade works though, KG can easily pickup the scoring. And you never trade barbosa.
2007-07-24 14:32:24 · answer #5 · answered by jovan kambell 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you from Minnesota??? I am and people in Minnesota ADORE Kevin Garrett. But I think he should be traded cause it's obvious he's not happy here. So I would with the 1st one.
2007-07-24 14:41:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first one not good for the suns cuz garnett is getting old but amare is a future mvp
2 good
2007-07-24 14:30:55 · answer #7 · answered by Big D 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i like the first the best
2007-07-24 15:07:17 · answer #8 · answered by Andy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the first ones ok. the 2nd is garbage.
2007-07-24 17:02:33 · answer #9 · answered by OohWhee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they both suck.
2007-07-28 11:14:50 · answer #10 · answered by Hi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋