2007-07-24 04:37:02 · 5 answers · asked by cougars#1 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
As much as I would like to believe they did, I don't think so. However I definately think that the spurs benifited from the refs bets.
2007-07-24 05:44:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, and to the guy that said the there was no consequence for the fouls on Nash, besides Horry being ejected and suspended, what other consequences are there?
2007-07-24 11:50:41 · answer #2 · answered by CoolHand 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I knew it would come to this, apparently one random act of stupidity and now the fans want to expand this to the possibility of other things that could have happened. Why don't we all just wait and see what becomes of all of this before we start jumping to conclusions.
2007-07-24 12:26:59 · answer #3 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't know. They sure seemed to be allowed to beat Nash into pulp without consequence.
2007-07-24 11:40:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO, I don't think they had anything to do with this.
2007-07-24 11:43:06 · answer #5 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋