"The United States, Iran and Iraq have agreed to set up a security subcommittee to carry forward talks on restoring stability in Iraq, the U.S. envoy said Tuesday at the end of a second round of groundbreaking talks with his Iranian counterpart." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070724/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_us_iran
2007-07-24 04:25:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe this is nothing more than a PR stunt by our government to recover lost voters from the GOP side,
Going into Iraq was on the books long BEFORE 9/11, and going into iran has long been on the books, americans are waking up finally to this fact, this is why I like Ron Paul, and I dont see Democrates as being our saviors, both parties answer to the central bankers, except Ron Paul, the Constitutionalist, how can we give Iraq a constitution, and we can't even obey our own. I'm a conservative, I think this is nothing more than a dog and pony show for people who have been dumbed down in our country, the only good plan there is, stay out of other country's affairs unless they posse a threat to our border's and national soverinty.
2007-07-24 04:59:25 · answer #1 · answered by Al 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Talk is very cheap . ACTIONS are what I'm looking for and what all conservatives are looking for . Actions become FACTS . Look into it .
But I don't expect much to come from this . I think we already know that and we're only going through the motions in order to prove to the world that Iran has no intention of any good whatsoever .
We shall see .
2007-07-24 11:34:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I can't believe it...... according to the news story, the US ambassador confronted his Iranian counterpart with accusations that Iran is helping the Shiite militias by providing arms, training, and also engaged in killing US soldiers. If I was President, and the evidence clearly proved that, I would not hesitate to bomb their infrastructure and put a naval blockade! C'mon, if that is not an act of war, then I don't know what is!
2007-07-24 11:32:11 · answer #3 · answered by Josh_NY 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's all for show. We know they don't care what we think and they know we don't what they think. But when the talks go south and Iran starts to become a real threat then what?
2007-07-24 11:30:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It might be, but I'm not sure how far we can trust the Iranians. I have hope that something useful will come of it but I'm not holding my breath.
2007-07-24 11:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's nice to talk and very PC.
Will it stop Iran from arming terrorists? No.
Will it stop their drive for a nuke? No.
But it is very PC and "group hug" like, therefore favored by Liberals.
2007-07-24 11:30:56 · answer #6 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Talking softly is fine as long as you carry a big stick.
.
2007-07-24 11:35:38 · answer #7 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's always good to talk and at least try to solve common problems.
2007-07-24 11:28:26 · answer #8 · answered by Brian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
THE DEM'S DON'T LIKE THE IDEA. THEY WANT TO BE THE NEGOTIATORS.
2007-07-24 11:36:15 · answer #9 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who do you think prompted the talks??...Joe Biden will say he did..but who do you think??
2007-07-24 11:29:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋