dont you think that yuvraj singh should have played in the series???
i would say that he, vvs laxman, and ms dhoni are very good players who can turn around a game.
but why did they select players that are obviously worse than yuvraj?
take dinesh karthik and wasim jaffer, for example. Each had a half century in one innings, but in the other innings, they collapsed. yuvraj is a consistint player who gets you a solid 40 runs or more every innings.
also, about rp singh
we all know he is a great bowler and just got a five wicket haul. he can swing the ball back in, and get the lbw, clean bowl, or the play down.
but don't you think he is a batsmen too? i know, this is a little off, but remember:
vs. sussex: solid forty runs, and leading scorer
vs. england(first innings): only 17 runs but hit some solid shots
vs. england(second innings): only 2 runs, but was trying to play some good shots
do you agree with me?
2007-07-23
18:29:44
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Edgehead (Colts 2-1)
4
in
Sports
➔ Cricket